Gotham Gazette

The Place for New York Policy and politics

CITY

City

What We Know After Primary Night in the Citywide and Borough-wide Races


mayor voting nyc

Mayor votes (photo: Michael Appleton/Mayor's Office)


Though voting in the Tuesday primary has concluded, the election is far from over. Absentee ballots have yet to be counted and ranked-choice votes have yet to be tabulated. While New Yorkers won’t know the final results from election night for possibly a few weeks, there are early unofficial results available and other notable numbers to watch.

What we know so far is the first-rank votes of those who cast ballots in person, either through early voting or on primary day. In the race for mayor, about 750,000 Democrats and 51,000 Republicans cast ballots across the city. While Curtis Sliwa declared victory in the two-candidate Republican primary, Eric Adams leads the Democratic primary by a significant margin, but Kathryn Garcia and Maya Wiley are within striking distance, while all other candidates are no longer viable.

Some initial clarity was also reached in the races for Public Advocate, Comptroller, borough presidencies, dozens of City Council seats, and the Manhattan District Attorney primary, which does not feature ranked-choice voting.

According to Board of Elections data, 221,008 voters had requested absentee ballots and 90,763 voters had returned them as of June 22. Of those who voted, 86,920 were Democrats and 3,831 were Republicans. Tens of thousands of additional absentee ballots could still arrive to the BOE in time to qualify to be counted, and they could shift dynamics in a number of races.

The absentee ballots returned thus far include 27,682 Democrats and 733 Republicans from Manhattan; 10,455 Democrats and 275 Republicans from the Bronx; 20,693 Democrats and 643 Republicans from Brooklyn; 24,139 Democrats and 1,210 Republicans from Queens; and 3,951 Democrats and 970 Republicans from Staten Island.

Absentee ballots postmarked as late as June 22 will still be valid if they are delivered to the BOE by June 29. But the BOE will then also offer absentee voters to “cure” mistakes on their ballot, sending notices to voters who will have to return them by July 9. Only then will the official vote count begin. Still, the BOE plans to do an initial yet unofficial ranked-choice runoff on June 29.

Mayor
There were 13 candidates on the Democratic primary ballot for mayor, though voters could choose up to five in order of preference under the new RCV system. 

The top tier of eight Democratic candidates, who were in all three official Campaign Finance Board debates, included Brooklyn Borough President Eric Adams, former sanitation commissioner Kathryn Garcia, former counsel to the mayor Maya Wiley, entrepreneur Andrew Yang, and Comptroller Scott Stringer, former Citigroup executive Ray McGuire, former federal housing secretary Shaun Donovan, and former nonprofit executive Dianne Morales.

Unofficial election night results from the BOE reported only first-choice votes cast in person from early voting and primary day. As of 12:20 a.m., with 95.9% of precincts counted, the board had tallied 749,175 votes in the Democratic primary.

Adams won 232,519 first-choice votes, or 31%, giving him a sizable lead, but falling well short of the 50%+1 threshold required to claim victory in a ranked-choice election. Adams performed well among Black and Latino voters, sweeping most of the Bronx, almost all of Central and Eastern Brooklyn, Southeast Queens and Staten Island's North Shore, according to an election map created by Steve Romalewski, director of the mapping service at Center for Urban Research at the CUNY Graduate Center.

Wiley was in second place with 22%, receiving a large share of her votes from Black communities in Brooklyn. She did well in Prospect Heights, Clinton Hill, Vedford-Stuyvesant, Bushwick, Williamsburg, Greenpoint, Ridgewood, and parts of Western Queens including Astoria, Long Island City, Sunnyside and Woodside.

Garcia was a close third with 20%. She did her best in almost all of Manhattan south of Harlem. She also won neighbrohoods in the Northwest Bronx, parts of waterfront Brooklyn including Dumbo and Cobble Hill, parts of the Mid-island and south shore of Staten Island, and isolated pockets all over Queens including Forest Hills and Middle Village.  

Yang, an early frontrunner whose campaign lost momentum in the last two months, was in fourth place and got about 11.7% of the in-person first-place votes. He quickly conceded the race on Tuesday night. “You all know I am a numbers guy, I'm someone who traffics in what's happening by the numbers,” he told his supporters at his Midtown election night party. “And I am not going to be the next mayor of New York City based upon the numbers that have come in. Tonight, I am conceding this race.”

Yang won neighborhoods with large Asian-American populations including Chinatown and Two Bridges in Lower Manhattan, in Elmhurst and large parts of Northeast Queens. He also won Orthodox Jewish neighborhoods in South Willimasburg, and in Borough Park and Bensonhurst in South Brooklyn.    

Stringer came in at a number that would have been unthinkable several months ago. He got a mere 5.1% after initially being considered one of the candidates to beat in the race. Morales received 2.8%, McGuire got about 2.4%, and Donovan 2.2%.

Absentee votes and the second choices of voters who selected Donovan, McGuire, Morales, Stringer, Yang, and the five lesser-known candidates as their first choices will determine what happens next.

The Republican primary for mayor was a two-way contest between Guardian Angels founder and radio host Curtis Sliwa, and Fernando Mateo, president of the New York State Federation of Taxi Drivers and a spokesperson for the United Bodegas of America.

With 95.5% of precincts reporting, 51,483 votes were counted. Sliwa handily won the race with 35,425 votes or 68.8% to Mateo’s 13,921 or 27%. Sliwa declared victory calling himself a “populist” and pledging to continue his focus on crime, support for the NYPD, quality of life, and animal welfare.

Comptroller and Public Advocate
The Democratic primary for comptroller featured City Council Speaker Corey Johnson, State Senator Brian Benjamin, financial journalist Michelle Caruso-Cabrera, military veteran and entrepreneur Zach Iscol, City Council Member Brad Lander, State Senator Kevin Parker, financial advisor Reshma Patel, fiscal analysis Terri Liftin, Assembly Member David Weprin, and college student Alex Pan.

With 96% of precincts reporting, and with 704,385 votes counted, Lander held a solid and somewhat surprising early lead with 31.4% of first-choice votes. Johnson was in second place with 22.5%, and Caruso-Cabrera trailing in third with almost 13.7%. The rest all were in single figures.

Public Advocate Jumaane Williams also faced a primary challenge, though he had nominal opposition from community leader Anthony Herbert and entrepreneur Theo Chino. With 96% of precincts tallied, accounting for 656,695 votes, Williams won with 459,826 or 70%. Herbert got 138,732 votes or 21% and Chino got 51,808 votes or about 7.9%.

Manhattan District Attorney
The District Attorney primary was the only election that did not involve ranked-choice voting, since it is technically a state position, and the winner is simply determined by whoever gets the most votes.

The crowded field included eight candidates: former Principal Deputy State Attorney General Alvin Bragg; former Manhattan Assistant District Attorneys Lucy Lang, Liz Crotty, and Diana Florence; civil rights attorney Tahanie Aboushi; Assemblymember Dan Quart; public defender Eliza Orlins; and Tali Farhadian Weinstein, the former general counsel to Brooklyn District Attorney Eric Gonzalez and a former federal prosecutor. 

With 97.8% of precincts counted, tallying 211,207 votes, Bragg led with 33.8% of the vote, with Farhadian Weinstein a close second with 30.5%. Aboushi was a distant third with 11.3%, while none of the others crossed into double digits. Absentee ballots will be counted to determine whether it is Bragg or Farhadian Weinstein who wins.

Borough President Races
Several borough president primaries are extremely close after the in-person vote tallies and heading toward absentees and ranked-choice runoffs.

The Brooklyn borough president race had 12 Democratic candidates on the primary ballot: State Assemblymember Jo Anne Simon, City Council Member Robert Cornegy, Jr., City Council Member Antonio Reynoso, City Council Member Mathieu Eugene, nonprofit executive Kimberly Council, former Brookdale Hospital executive Khari Edwards, Robert Elstein, Pearlene Fields, Anthony Jones, Robert Ramos, Jr., Trisha Ocona, and Lamor Miller-Whitehead.

With 95.6% of precincts reporting, 231,234 votes had been counted. Reynoso emerged with a comfortable lead, receiving 28.3% of the vote. Cornegy was in second receiving 18.7%, just a razor-thin margin above Simon who had almost 18.2% of the vote. Eugene was in fourth with about 8%.

In the Democratic primary for Manhattan borough president, the seven candidates included Lindsey Boylan, former state deputy secretary for economic development and housing; Kimberly Watkins, president of Community Education Council 3; City Council Member Mark Levine; Elizabeth Caputo, former chair of Manhattan’s Community Board 7; State Senator Brad Hoylman; City Council Member Ben Kallos; and Guillermo Perez.

After 98.4% of precincts had reported and 200,152 votes counted, Levine led the race with 28.7%. But Hoylman was close behind with almost 25.7%. Kallos in third with 12.1%, Boylan fourth with 10.4% and Caputo fifth with 9.8%. It appears all but certain that the race will come down to Levine and Hoylman as absentees are counted and the RCV runoff is performed.

The Democratic primary for Bronx borough president was a five-way contest between City Council Member Fernando Cabrera, City Council Member Vanessa Gibson, State Assemblymember Nathalia Fernandez, State Senator Luis Sepúlveda, and former NYPD lieutenant Sammy Ravelo.

With 95% of precincts reported and 84,169 votes counted, Gibson led with 39.2% while Cabrera trailed closely with 34.3%. Fernandez was at 14.2% while Sepulveda was at 9.9%.

Queens Borough President Donovan Richards was elected in a special election last year, after his predecessor Melinda Katz became Queens District Attorney. Richards was challenged in this Democratic primary by Council Member Jimmy Van Bramer and former Council Member Elizabeth Crowley.

Richards received 41.5% of first-choice votes, holding a marginal lead over Crowley, who had 40.2% by the time 95.3% of precincts had reported and 156,023 votes had been counted. Van Bramer received 17.8%. The race will now come down to the absentee votes and the instant runoff between Richards and Crowley, so the voters who picked Van Bramer as their first choice will be crucial in terms of their second choices.

Five Democrats sought the primary nomination for Staten Island borough president, one of the few positions in municipal government that is currently held by a Republican, term-limited Borough President Jimmy Oddo. They included attorney Cesar Vargas, labor leader Radhakrishna Mohan, real estate developer Mark Murphy, activist and business owner Lorie Honor, and Brandon Stradford, community liaison to City Council Member Debi Rose.

After 97.9% of precincts reporting and 23,612 votes counted, Murphy had a seemingly insurmountable lead with 46.2% of the vote. Honor was in second with almost 21%, and Vargas in third with about 13.7%.

With Oddo on the way out the door, four Republicans faced off in a primary to replace him: term-limited Council Member Steve Matteo, political consultant Leticia Remauro, former Rep. Vito Fossella, and Jhong Kim, a martial arts and real-estate magnate.

With 97.9% of precincts reporting and 17,547 votes counted, Fossella held a slight lead with 42.2%, and Matteo was just behind with 41%. Remauro got 13.4% and Kim got 2.6%. ALong with the absentee voter preferences, Remauro’s voters’ second choices will be pivotal.

Mayoral Candidates’ Campaign Finances
Altogether, the top eight Democratic candidates raised more than $20.1 million in private contributions, received more than $37.2 million in public funds from the Campaign Finance Board, and spent more than $52.7 million, as of June 7, when the latest campaign finance disclosures were released. 

But, by election day, more than $37.1 million went into the mayoral race from independent spenders and so-called Super PACs. Nearly all the top candidates benefitted from that outside spending, though some far more than others.

McGuire, who funded his campaign entirely from private donations, spent a whopping $10.5 million by June 7, after having raised more than $11.9 million (which included a personal donation of $1 million and a loan of $2 million from his own pocket). An independent political action committee called New York for Ray spent a separate $5.74 million in support of McGuire’s campaign.

Adams came second in expenditure, disbursing $9.4 million after raising nearly $4.9 million and receiving more than $6.4 million in public matching funds. But he topped the chart in how much outside spending was in his favor. Independent spenders put $7.7 million into aiding Adams. The biggest spenders from that included the Empire State 32BJ SEIU PAC, the People for a Better NY political committee, and Hotel Workers for Stronger Communities. Groups that opposed Adams spent merely $20,555 against him.

Stringer had spent about $8.4 million on his race. He had raised nearly $3.8 million in private contributions and got more than $6.4 million in public funds. More than $5.3 million in outside spending was in support of Stringer’s campaign, and more than 60% of that came from NY4KIDS Inc., a PAC associated with the United Federation of Teachers, the municipal teachers union.

Yang spent just under $8.1 million on his campaign, having raised more than $3.9 million and qualifying for $6.4 million in public funds.

Outside spenders put more than $3.8 million towards helping Yang’s campaign. Almost all of that, about $3.2 million, came from Comeback PAC, a group created by political strategist Lis Smith, who most recently worked as a senior advisor to Pete Buttigieg’s presidential campaign. Yang was the candidate with the most outside spending levelled against him, with about $167,000 in ads opposing his candidacy.

Wiley had spent over $6.1 million on her campaign. She had raised more than $1.8 million and public funds payments of more than $5.4 million. More than $1.9 million was spent by outside groups in support of her campaign, most of which came from 1199 for Maya, the PAC run by the 1199 SEIU healthcare workers union that endorsed her.

Garcia spent a total of nearly $5 million by June 7, having raised more than $1.9 million in private contributions and more than $6.4 million in public funds. New Generation of Leadership PAC spent nearly $200,000 to support Garcia.

Donovan spent about $4.08 million on his campaign. He had raised more than $2.8 million and received just over $2 million in public funds. But an outside expenditure committee, New Start NYC, spent nearly $6.5 million to aid Donovan. The PAC raised more than $6.97 million, of which $6.8 million came from Donovan’s father alone.

Morales spent more than $1.2 million after raising about $875,000 and receiving more than $3.9 million in public funds. The Downtown Independent Democrats spent $1,425 in her favor.

***
by Samar Khurshid, senior reporter, Gotham Gazette
     

Read more by this writer.

Note - this article has been updated. 

What Have The Top Democratic Mayoral Candidates Actually Accomplished?


what have leading

l-r: Kathryn Garcia, Eric Adams, Scott Stringer, Andrew Yang, Maya Wiley


The Democratic mayoral race is the most diverse it has ever been in the city’s history, both in terms of the candidates and the records they bring to the table. In the top tier of eight candidates, there are two sitting elected officials, two former top de Blasio administration officials, a former presidential candidate, a former Wall Street executive, a former Obama cabinet secretary, and a former nonprofit leader.

In the last two weeks, though the race remains unpredictable, the upper echelon of the field has seemed to winnow down to five candidates – Brooklyn Borough President Eric Adams, former sanitation commissioner Kathryn Garcia, former counsel to the mayor Maya Wiley, entrepreneur Andrew Yang, and Comptroller Scott Stringer. Former Citigroup executive Ray McGuire, former federal housing secretary Shaun Donoovan, and former nonprofit executive Dianne Morales have consistently polled near the bottom of the pack and seem unlikely to have a path to victory.   

Each of the candidates has offered their argument for why they would be the ideal leader to help usher in the city’s recovery from the pandemic, asking voters to judge their backgrounds and visions. It remains for voters to decide whether they will prefer candidates with a wealth of experience in government service or those with an outside perspective from private industry, whether they will vote for what a candidate has done in the past or what they promise to do in the future.

While most of the election has focused on candidates’ plans for their mayoralties and stances on key issues facing the city, with some examination of parts of their records, what have these top mayoral candidates really accomplished that voters should in part judge them on? Here’s a look at the top five Democrats in the polls:

Eric Adams
Adams was a police officer for 22 years, eventually becoming an NYPD captain, before becoming an elected official. In his time in the department, he co-founded 100 Blacks in Law Enforcement Who Care, an advocacy group aimed at fighting police brutality and racial profiling from within the department. The group raised thousands of dollars, awarded community grants and did public trainings about how people should respond when stopped by the police. Adams became a regular, high-profile voice on police reform and eliminating racial bias in policing.

Adams also touts having been part of the department as it modernized and brought crime down, saying he helped develop the CompStat program and that, along with his regular police work, was key to the crime reductions of the ‘90s and into the 2000s.

He then moved from the NYPD to elected office, winning a State Senate seat, then becoming borough president. Though there were structural barriers in his way, Adams has few major accomplishments to show for his time in the two offices. While there is more to the story, his mayoral campaign website names no specific accomplishments from his time in government, only broad areas where he’s fought for change.

Between 2006 and 2013, Adams served four terms in the state Senate, representing Central Brooklyn. But he did not successfully sponsor many significant pieces of legislation, likely since he was in the minority almost the entire time. He pushed legislation to place tight restrictions on the sale of ammunition, which would eventually be approved through separate legislation. He also sponsored legislation to ban the NYPD from compiling a database of people who are stopped but not arrested by officers.

Adams launched free public safety seminars for New York City parents, covering issues like gang awareness and child abuse prevention, and an annual "Cradle to College" parent and youth empowerment seminar. His defining moment in the Senate was his impassioned defense of legalizing same-sex marriage in 2009 – the bill failed that year but was approved in 2011. 

In 2013, Adams was elected to become the first Black borough president of Brooklyn.

Since 2014, he’s served two terms in the position that comes with few powers but a prominent bully pulpit. The borough president’s office doesn’t lend itself to high-impact policy-making, though the borough president can request and introduce legislation before the City Council. For instance, he co-sponsored a bill with Council Member Ydanis Rodriguez requiring the mayor to create an Office of Sports, Wellness and Recreation. It was approved in May of this year.

As borough president, Adams launched several initiatives focused on public health, after being diagnosed with diabetes and adopting a healthy plant-based diet and a wellness-focused lifestyle, reversing his own illness. Working with the de Blasio administration, he created a plant-based lifestyle medicine program at NYC Health + Hospitals/Bellevue. The program, which Adams has touted on the mayoral campaign trail as a top accomplishment, provides treatment to people with chronic conditions through a holistic combination of dietary, lifestyle and medicinal changes.

He also convinced the administration to pilot a “Meatless Mondays” program to reduce meat consumption in 15 Brooklyn schools – the program was later expanded citywide to all 1,700 public schools. And in partnership with City Council Member Fernando Cabrera, Adams was able to successfully push through a ban on processed meats in school lunches. 

Other elements of his work as borough presidents, like most who hold the role, included advocacy on issues with limited or nebulous results. In 2017, Adams, along with Bronx Borough President Ruben Diaz Jr. (who has now endorsed him for mayor), created a new “Gifted and Talented Education Task Force” to examine issues around gifted and talented programs and admissions to specialized high schools. It pointed to ongoing questions around limited programming in communities of color, part of the ongoing debate over school admissions processes. The effort does not appear to have resulted in any changes but may have contributed to the wave of commentary warning against eliminating or replacing such programs. 

“As a child I lived on the verge of homelessness, but I also learned how to turn my pain into purpose,” Adams said at the second official primary debate on June 2. “I became a police officer, an NYPD reformer, a state lawmaker, and now your Brooklyn Borough President, all the time leaning into the blue collar values that were handed down to me by my single mom. I'm going to use those blue collar values to create a city where we will raise healthy children and families. I know we can have a safe, affordable city. This is our moment, and our movement.”  

There are several blemishes on Adams’ record as voters consider his accomplishments. As a state Senator, in 2010, he voted against the expulsion of fellow Democratic State Senator Hiram Monserrate from the chamber, after Monserrate had been convicted of assaulting his girlfriend. He claimed at the time that it was because he wanted the legal process to play out. 

Over the years, Adams has also skirted ethics and campaign finance rules, leading to investigations at the local, state, and federal levels though he has never been charged with any crimes. While in the Senate, when he chaired the Racing, Gaming and Wagering Committee, a state inspector general investigated the bidding process for a casino at the Aqueduct racetrack in Queens. The IG’s report in 2010 stated that Adams was one of several lawmakers guilty of “failing to fulfill their public duty” and said he gave non-credible testimony while also receiving campaign contributions from the winning bidder

As borough president, Adams launched the nonprofit One Brooklyn Fund to promote the borough’s interests. But he raised money for the fund from donors who had business with the city, raising questions about whether he was circumventing city campaign finance rules while burnishing his political prospects. The arrangement was investigated by the city’s Department of Investigation and federal prosecutors and no charges were filed. Recent reporting has also pointed to issues and raised questions around Adams’ tax filings.

Kathryn Garcia
Garcia has highlighted a number of accomplishments from her roughly 14 years in city government, including instances where she was at or near the top of three city agencies but also filled in as a crisis manager to take on other roles. She has managed large bureaucratic agencies, many thousands of workers, and large budgets.

Prior to that, for ten years, she was vice president of New York Appleseed, a nonprofit consulting and advocacy firm.

From 2007 till 2014, Garcia served at the Department of Environmental Protection under Mayor Michael Bloomberg. She would eventually become chief operating officer, overseeing the Bureaus of Water Supply, Water and Sewer Operations, and Wastewater. While at DEP, according to her campaign website, she “rid the city of #6 heating oil,” a heavy-polluting fuel that was used for home heating systems. She helped reduce the department’s repair backlog from 3,000 to 300, saved the department $30 million with efficiency measures, and helped restore wastewater treatment infrastructure in the wake of Hurricane Sandy.  

From March 2014 till September 2020, Garcia was de Blasio’s sanitation chief. She successfully championed a ban on styrofoam containers and packing material, created the city’s first electronic waste recycling program, and launched an organics recycling program. Perhaps her two biggest accomplishments were helping to negotiate and usher through an environmental justice law to limit how much trash communities can process and a law to regulate the deeply problematic private carting industry, creating new commercial waste zones.

Garcia also modernized snow removal operations at Sanitation, adding GPS systems to snowplows for real-time monitoring. Under her tenure, the city mismanaged only one major snow storm, though it was an unpredictable one where the forecast shifted dramatically. 

But she didn’t just carry out those duties, she also served as the mayor’s “lead czar,” charged with mitigating the city’s lead paint exposure crisis that had affected young children. De Blasio also made her the interim chair and CEO of the New York City Housing Authority, when the agency’s struggling finances and management crises came to a head, in part over lead exposure for young children. Garcia filled that role for a tumultuous year, attempting to bring more organization to the sprawling authority during an especially challenging time and to move it ahead on several key goals, including lead remediation, but also revenue-raising measures.

While lead exposure did continue to fall in the city, the problem at NYCHA remained relatively unchanged, and she was even upbraided by a federal monitor who said she gave a “misleading impression” of the agency’s lead abatement efforts in testimony to the City Council.

Finally, when the pandemic hit, Garcia was appointed the city’s emergency food czar and oversaw the distribution of more than 130 million meals to New Yorkers in need. While largely heralded, the program did have its share of missteps, most of which Garcia took ownership of while also pointing to the fact that the program was moving in haste during the pandemic to ensure millions of New Yorkers didn’t go hungry after losing access to food and/or wages. The city gave contracts to vendors without a proven track record, including for emergency food distribution, including a particular contract for $14 million awarded to a vendor with a recent criminal conviction, though Garcia terminated the contract when that became evident. There were instances of food delivered to the wrong locations, delivery of rotten food, and at least one incident where boxes of food were dumped on the street. 

"I have been the city's crisis manager for the last 14 years, I have managed billions of dollars of budgets, as well as tens of thousands of staff,” Garcia said during the first official primary debate. “I have pumped water during Hurricane Sandy, and during COVID, delivered a million meals a day to hungry and sick New Yorkers...And I am ready to execute on the vision on day one. I don't need to be told where the lights are in City Hall, and I want to make this a better New York for all of us."

David Birdsell, the dean of Baruch College’s Marxe School of Public and International Affairs, said Garcia stands out in the field for her concrete record of accomplishments in city government. They are “not typically the kinds of accomplishments that people use as a platform for mayoral races, but they are the kind of bread and butter accomplishments that suggest a key knowledge of how to manage city agencies, working with unionized workforces to solve problems that have dimensions that are logistical, physical and conceptual,” Birdsell said.

“She has a different capacity to point to accomplishments in her record that are germane to the office of the mayor,” he added.

Maya Wiley
Wiley has had a career as a civil rights lawyer, which she began at the NAACP Legal Defense Fund in 1992. She later served in the civil rights division at the office of the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York for three years between 1994 and 1997 and was a senior adviser on race and poverty at the Open Society Foundations till 1999. She has said her focus on civil rights and economic justice issues has been at the center of all those roles. “Everything I've done, every step I've taken has always been about creating more coalition and building more opportunity for communities of color,” she said in a February interview on Decision NYC, hosted by Gotham Gazette and Manhattan Neighborhood Network. “Because it lifts all boats. Because at the end of the day it is about all of us and it's part of what called me in the race.” 

In 2002, Wiley co-founded what she touts as perhaps her signature accomplishment on the mayoral campaign trail when discussing her resume, the Center for Social Inclusion, a national nonprofit advocacy group aimed at fighting racial inequity across the country. But it’s hard to gauge what the organization accomplished under her leadership. Her campaign did not provide any highlights of her tenure at the organization, when asked. She served there for the next twelve years, becoming president in 2012. According to the New York Times, “She built it into a national organization dedicated to addressing racial inequity, with a $3 million annual budget and 13 employees.” 

“The character of her career was established over decades and she cares deeply about equity issues, but it's not clear what she's been able to accomplish there,” Birdsell said of Wiley. 

Upon joining the de Blasio administration in 2014, Wiley spent two-and-a-half years as the mayor’s top legal counsel. Along with giving the mayor a broad range of legal and policy advice, she was responsible for crafting the city law that limited cooperation with the federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency, which was seen by progressives as a major accomplishment though questions have been raised about her effort to slightly water down the final language.

She led the effort to increase city contracting with Minority- and Women-Owned Business Enterprises. According to an Observer report, in the first two years and one quarter of the administration, coinciding with Wiley’s purview, mayoral agencies awarded $1.79 billion to M/WBEs, about $700 million more than in the last two years and one quarter of Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s term.

She also spearheaded the administration’s initiatives to expand broadband internet access across the city. On the campaign trail, Wiley has repeatedly touted the success of her efforts and in particular, one project: providing free internet to the roughly 6,000 residents of the Queensbridge Houses public housing development. But, an analysis by The City, showed that Wiley had mixed success with the overall effort even if she laid the foundations for the city’s current citywide approach. Wiley has said one reason she left the de Blasio administration was her frustration over the pace of change, and argues she left a strong blueprint in place that was not well-followed afterward. She touts having gotten a $70 million line-item for broadband expansion into the city’s capital budget for the first time. And she also helped negotiate the city’s deal to set up LinkNYC wi-fi kiosks to replace phone booths, which was meant to be funded with revenue raised from advertisement. However, the kiosks have not been built as fast as initially projected and revenue has been well below projections.

Leaving the mayor’s office, de Blasio named her chair of the Civilian Complaint Review Board (CCRB), a police oversight agency, and she served there for just over a year. Wiley has claimed credit for advancing the disciplinary case against Daniel Pantaleo, the NYPD officer whose chokehold led to Eric Garner’s death, but her record there has been a subject of some debate.

After leaving the CCRB, Wiley became co-director of the Digital Equity Lab at The New School and taught some courses there before leaving to run for mayor.  At the Lab, Wiley worked with graduate students to study issues related to the digital divide in New York City. The lab selected three projects, developed them for months including through community engagement, and then presented recommendations to a panel of city government and community partners. She also co-led de Blasio’s School Diversity Advisory Group, focused on examining school segregation in the city, which offered sweeping recommendations that the mayor gave limited attention to and Wiley is vowing to move ahead on aggressively if elected. [Read: Maya Wiley's School Choice]

“Maya is a leader in city government and in spurring democratic change,” her campaign website says. “As Counsel to the Mayor, she delivered for New York City on civil and immigrant rights, women and minority owned business contracts, universal broadband access and more. In the five years since she left City Hall, she held police accountable as Chair of the Civilian Complaint Review Board and worked to improve public education as a Co-Chair of the School Diversity Task Force.” It also notes her work at The New School and as a legal analyst for NBC News and MSNBC, being “founder and president of the Center for Social Inclusion,” though it mentions no accomplishments from that effort. “Maya was also Senior Advisor on Race and Poverty at the Open Society Foundations, the largest funder of human rights work the world over," it states.

Andrew Yang
A lawyer by training, Yang has spent most of his career in the world of startups, small businesses, and nonprofits. After quitting his first job as an attorney in just five months, he launched Stargiving.com with a co-worker, to connect celebrities and charities. He then spent three years working for a company that manages medical information.

Yang’s first prominent career accomplishment came next. In 2006, he joined Manhattan Prep, a test prep company, and later became CEO. The company, which focused on the GMAT business school exam, experienced a windfall in the wake of the Great Recession and sold to Kaplan, a national test prep firm, a few years later, making Yang a millionaire. That business growth is what Yang most-often touts on the campaign trail as his key professional accomplishment that prepares him to be mayor. He has, however, been accused of gender discrimination by two female employees of the company, which he has denied.  

Yang is also proud of Venture For America, a nonprofit organization he launched in 2011 to recruit college graduates for startup firms in struggling cities across the country. Yang’s project twice got him recognition from President Barack Obama’s administration. Yang has claimed the group has created 5,000 jobs, though a New York Times analysis showed it was closer to 150, with both numbers well short of the 100,000-job goal Yang had set. 

“I have the experience that a lot of New Yorkers can relate to, which is that I owned and operated a small private company that then grew to become number one in the country,” he said at the second mayoral debate, when asked about his qualifications to run for mayor. “And if you've ever run a business you know a few things. No one cares about excuses or politics. You have to make the numbers work, you have to recruit a team and build a positive culture.” Pointing to his nonprofit and his advocacy for cash relief, he added, “People in New York know exactly what I've been up to the past several years and they know this is exactly the kind of experience we need in this time of crisis to lead our city in a better direction.”

Yang has published two books, “Smart People Should Build Things” and “The War on Normal People.” The second book, released just before his presidential run and focused on universal basic income and the effects of technology on jobs, became a New York Times Bestseller.

Much like the current race, Yang ran an unconventional presidential campaign and grew a national movement, repopularizing the concept of a universal basic income. He raised $41 million and qualified for the primary debate stage eight times. The campaign made him a celebrity and sought-after endorser, landing him a gig at CNN as a political analyst, and boosting his name recognition and network ahead of the mayoral run that would follow. 

Yang did not, however, win any delegates and dropped out of the presidential race after the New Hampshire primary. His campaign was later accused by former staffers of fostering a “toxic” work environment with a “bro culture” comprised of sexist and discriminatory behavior. 

Yang also recently launched the nonprofit Humanity Forward Foundation, after abandoning his bid for the presidency. The group has launched pilot programs built on his campaign, which centered on the idea of providing a basic income to every American adult. Humanity Forward has distributed at least $1 million in the Bronx as one of its basic income initiatives. 

“It was very hard to point to, aside from a sterling academic record, anything that signals outstanding accomplishment on his part either on the corporate side or on the nonprofit side,” Birdsell said of Yang. “He promises big results. He underdelivers.”

Scott Stringer 
Stringer has been in politics virtually all of his entire life. Stringer represented the Upper West Side on the state Assembly from 1993 though 2005. During that tenure, he passed 40 laws, chiefly spearheading major reform to the chamber's rules, including ending 'empty-seat voting’ by mandating that legislators be present to vote on bills, according to his campaign. He sponsored the repeal of tax cuts on the wealthy that had been implemented under Governor George Pataki and unsuccessfully fought against the weakening of rent laws. He also co-sponsored the state’s first marriage equality bill, and was an early backer of the Gender Expression Non-Discrimination Act (GENDA), which was approved last year. 

From 2006 till 2013, Stringer served as Manhattan borough president, during which he was known for a relatively pro-development stance and he says he helped negotiate a number of good projects including rezonings in East Midtown, Hudson Square, and at Columbia University’s Manhattanville campus. He also reformed the community board appointment process, putting an end to patronage positions. 

As comptroller, though he audited the performance of city agencies and scrutinized the administration’s budgeting practices, he could not single-handedly affect changes on those fronts. Several of his audits have had a major impact, bringing attention to severe problems at city agencies and leading to reforms by the administration. Those include several audits of NYCHA highlighting a backlog of repairs, wasted spending on roof maintenance, and inefficient management of heating maintenance complaints ; an audit showing that the Administration for Children’s Services endangered thousands of children by failing to adequately investigate abuse allegations; and another that put a spotlight on dangerous conditions for children at family homeless shelters.

Where Stringer took perhaps his most prominent role was his work overseeing the city’s now $253 billion pension system (it was roughly $161 billion in his first year in office). He has successfully pushed three of the five pension funds to divest about $4 billion from the fossil fuel industry and also persuaded the entire pension system to divest from private prisons. He has also been an activist investor by pushing companies that the funds invest in to promote more diversity on their corporate boards. Stringer has pointed out that the pension funds have hit annual growth targets almost each year, though the city has also grown its share of pension payouts from the city operating budget. 

Stringer created a new ClaimStat portal, which allows data-driven analysis of legal claims against the city. He says it has saved tens of millions of dollars in taxpayer money. And he has succeeded in pushing the administration to increase contracting to Minority- and Women-Owned Business Enterprises. He boosted M/WBE spending in his own office from 13% to 50%, part of his work as seen in annual reports on city entities and agencies where he grades their M/WBE efforts.

Stringer also appointed a chief diversity officer at the comptroller’s office, and pushed the mayor to do so at every city agency, which de Blasio eventually did through an executive order. 

“Thirty years of progressive leadership in this city is what I bring to the table as New Yorkers choose who will lead our city's greatest comeback,” Stringer said at the second debate.

“As City Comptroller, Scott Stringer has exposed waste and mismanagement in every city agency,” his campaign website reads. “He has overseen growth in the City’s $240-billion pension funds, the fourth largest in the nation, to record levels. He took on the private prison industry and the world’s largest fossil fuel companies, advancing the causes of climate justice and decarceration. He forced corporations across America to diversify their boardrooms. His plans for a comprehensive city-run childcare program would make New York the national leader. And over the last year, every step of the way, he’s pushed Bill de Blasio to fix the City’s response to COVID-19."

Stringer’s mayoral campaign had momentum until sexual harassment and assault allegations were made by a volunteer from his 2001 campaign for public advocate, which led many of his endorsers to rescind their support and a barrage of negative news coverage. While he denied the claims, his poll numbers ultimately froze and then dropped and his campaign has struggled to move ahead. A second accuser later came forward to say Stringer had groped her repeatedly when she worked for him at a bar and restaurant he once owned and operated.

[MORE: Where They Stand: Compare Top Democratic Mayoral Candidates On The Issues]

***
by Samar Khurshid, senior reporter, Gotham Gazette
     

Read more by this writer.

'This Is The System We Chose': New York City's First Ranked-Choice Mayoral Vote Unfolds


how primary votes

Voters voting (photo: Michael Appleton/Mayoral Photography Office)


As the final vote in the consequential Democratic mayoral primary nears, controversy has erupted around the new ranked-choice voting (RCV) format and the tactics some campaigns are using to wrangle votes.

Supporters of RCV have said the system forces candidates to seek a broader base of support. But after candidates Kathryn Garcia and Andrew Yang teamed up this past weekend in the hopes of being the second-round pick of each other's supporters, Eric Adams' campaign and its surrogates said the collaboration was a move to diminish the power of Black voters and falsely likened it to "voter suppression." A number of candidates, good government groups, and voting rights advocates condemned the comments for their potential to undermine confidence in the election outcome.

The episode raises the spectre of a leading candidate calling into doubt election results (à la Donald Trump) in the first citywide race to use the new voting system, after voters approved it in a referendum two years ago. While he has been critical of RCV, and his allies previously sued to try to stop its implementation this year, Adams has repeatedly said he will accept the results of the election.

Complicating matters is the fact that absentee voting is continuing at a far larger scale than pre-pandemic elections, meaning final election results will not be known for about three weeks after primary day.

While extremely limited unofficial election night tallies will be available Tuesday evening -- only the first-round choices of voters who cast ballots in person during the early voting period and on primary day -- the lack of absentee and affidavit ballots and voters' latter-round choices will make their meaning obscure. Full results will likely not be known until the week of July 12 after all absentee ballots have been tallied.

In the meantime, the New York City Board of Elections (BOE) will publish various tranches of voting information as ballots come in. The BOE has said it will take a week to release tabulated results of votes cast in person (about 191,000 people voted in person at an early voting poll site this June), but those numbers will still be missing tens of thousands of absentee votes and limited in meaning.

State law requires administrators to wait seven days after polls close to begin counting absentee ballots. A week later, on July 6, the BOE will release an updated unofficial tabulation of in-person votes and absentee ballots received to date.

Thanks to a recently enacted state law, absentee voters are given the opportunity to correct certain disqualifying mistakes on their ballots, even after polls close. The last day for voters to submit a ballot "cure" is Friday, July 9. After the results of all in-person, absentee, and affidavit ballots are counted and the election results certified the BOE will publish the full vote tally for each round of RCV, according to board officials.

"This is the system we chose. It's going to take time for us to count all the votes but we're going to learn patience as New Yorkers," Garcia told reporters Monday.

Recent polling in the race has shown Adams with a lead, followed in by a shifting combination of Garcia, Wiley, and Yang.

Over the weekend, Garcia and Yang greeted voters and held get-out-the-vote rallies that highlighted the use of RCV. Yang told his supporters to rank Garcia second on their ballots, while Garcia did not return the favor. As the two paired up on the campaign trail, Adams and his endorsers responded by attacking the candidates and the process. 

On Saturday and Sunday, Adams' campaign issued statements from numerous supporters ranking high in New York's political class, calling the Garcia-Yang coordination a cynical effort to game the system including, they claimed, by overpowering Black voters who are overwhelmingly for Adams.

"It is an act of political chicanery and introduces a very disturbing dividing of the city’s electorate and when these actions appear to be designed to hurt one particular candidate it can also divide the city on racial or ethnic lines...The problem with the rank choice voting process itself is that it enables candidates to manipulate the process in a way that defies the will of the voters," said former Governor David Paterson in a highly-disputed statement released by Adams' campaign Saturday. Critics pointed out that candidates encouraging their supporters to rank another candidate second does not defy the will of voters any more than other endorsements. Adams himself has touted receiving second-rank endorsements from officials like Rep. Hakeem Jeffries.

Susan Lerner of Common Cause New York, a good government group that has advocated for RCV, called the Garcia-Yang partnership "a legitimate strategy in a democratically approved system of election."

A number of other politicians of color echoed the sentiment including, Rep. Gregory Meeks, Bronx Borough President Ruben Diaz, Jr., Council Members Laurie Cumbo and Ydanis Rodriguez, Assembly Member Jenifer Rajkumar, County Leader Keith Wright, and activist Ashley Sharpton (daughter of Al Sharpton). Former State Comptroller H. Carl McCall called the move by Garcia and Yang, who are white and of Asian descent, respectively, a form of "voter suppression," though it is unclear how he came to that conclusion.

"Any attempts to frame RCV as too complicated or discourage voters from fully exercising their rights to vote are wrong and harmful to our community," said Lurie Daniel Favors, interim executive director of the Center for Law and Social Justice at Medgar Evers College. "As proponents of justice through expanded voting rights, CLSJ urges all candidates, particularly those from our communities, to embrace ranked-choice voting and encourage New Yorkers to educate and empower themselves in order to employ our new voting system during the current primary."

Public Advocate Jumaane Williams, who has endorsed Wiley, and State Senator Zellnor Myrie, who chairs the Senate’s election committee, also denounced voter suppression claims through their Twitter accounts.

Even as his campaign pushed out the statements, Adams kept them at arm’s length without condemning them. He said Monday he would accept the final results published by the BOE. "Yes, I will accept -- definite, definite -- I believe in the system," he said. But when asked by WNYC's Gwynne Hogan at a later campaign stop if he could assure voters that he is not trying to claim the election could be stolen, Adams did not answer directly: "Yes I do, I assure voters that no one is going to steal the election from me," he told press outside his campaign office.

Garcia and Yang each refuted the claims of impropriety and suppression, as did Wiley, a Black woman and civil rights attorney who at one time worked at the NAACP Legal Defense Fund.

"At a time when this country is seeing real voter suppression laws being enacted, using racism charges to undermine confidence in Ranked Choice Voting is cynical, self-interested and dangerous," said Wiley, who had pushed for RCV's passage, in a statement Monday. "[T]his partnership is not racist and we should not be using this term so loosely against other candidates."

Yang's co-campaign managers, Sasha Ahuja and Chris Coffey, alluded to the suppression argument as, "baseless, undemocratic misinformation," in a joint statement Monday.

Garcia's campaign released a memo early in the day on Monday making clear that no candidate is likely to win on election night -- a victory would require more than 50% of first-place votes -- and that RCV was widely supported by voters in the 2019 referendum.

At a campaign stop in Bedford-Stuyvesant, Brooklyn, where he voted Tuesday, a teary-eyed Adams said he would accept the election results in honor of his mother who died a few months ago and was "betrayed" by the healthcare system, reported Ross Barkan on Twitter. "This is about ending the betrayals of every day families in this city," Adams said, according to Barkan. "Are you going to accept the outcome? Darn right I am...I am not going to do anything to desecrate the name of my mother."

***
by Ethan Geringer-Sameth, reporter, Gotham Gazette
     

Read more by this writer.



Print Friendly and PDF

Editor's Choice


Gotham Gazette: New York Voters Approve $4.2 Billion Environmental Bond Act
New York Voters Approve $4.2 Billion Environmental Bond Act
Gotham Gazette: 
New York City Voters Approve Racial Justice Ballot Measures
New York City Voters Approve Racial Justice Ballot Measures
Gotham Gazette: 
Housing Development in New York City Slows to a Crawl as Officials Debate Tax Incentives
Housing Development in New York City Slows to a Crawl as Officials Debate Tax Incentives
Gotham Gazette: 
City Council Examines Low Voter Turnout, Moving Local Elections to Even Years City Council Examines Low Voter Turnout, Moving Local Elections to Even Years