Gotham Gazette

The Place for New York Policy and politics

CITY

City

Max & Murphy Podcast: How the City's Economy is Working


ferry navy yards

(photo: Edwin J. Torres/Mayoral Photo Office)


January 29, 2020 - Max & Murphy Podcast: How the City's Economy is Working

samuels ortiz wbaiJulie Samuels of Tech:NYC and Joey Ortiz of the New York City Employment and Training Coalition joined the show to discuss the New York City economy, jobs and workforce development, the tech sector and how tech is part of all other sectors, and more.

Listen to the conversation and let us know what you think -- we're on Twitter @TweetBenMax and @JarrettMurphy. You can listen to the show through the embedded audio below or download the episode wherever you get your podcasts, under "Max & Murphy," and listen to Max & Murphy live on Wednesdays at 5 p.m. on WBAI radio, 99.5FM or wbai.org.

***
by Ben Max, Gotham Gazette
     

Read more by this writer.

Stringer Calls for 'Universal Affordable Housing' and Overhaul of City Subsidy Use


comptroller universal

Comptroller Scott Stringer (photo: @NYCComptroller)


New York City Comptroller Scott Stringer on Wednesday again took aim at perhaps the most pressing issue facing New Yorkers: housing affordability, and while repeatedly criticizing Mayor Bill de Blasio’s approach, unveiled a new plan headlined by a “universal affordable housing” proposal to require income-targeted units in every new development across the five boroughs.

Stringer, a fellow Democrat who hopes to succeed the term-limited de Blasio by winning next year’s mayoral election, is also calling for fully using city subsidies to help create new affordable housing for low- and very low-income households, a new nonprofit land bank to better utilize city-owned vacant lots, and ending state-authorized tax abatements that he argues are not spurring enough affordable housing.

The comptroller’s overall plan, which also includes a component aimed at increasing home ownership in the city, is dubbed “Housing We Need,” and seeks to take a more comprehensive approach, he said, than the current piecemeal efforts that too often involve upzoning communities of color to add housing that accelerates gentrification and keeps the city racially segregated. De Blasio’s approach, Stringer has long-argued and reiterated Wednesday, does not utilize city dollars to subsidize enough housing for those who are most rent-burdened, many on the verge of losing their homes.

Universal affordable housing would be a “fundamental shift” in the city’s approach, Stringer stressed, more aptly responding to the affordability crisis, and requiring that 25% of all new as-of-right development with ten or more units is set aside for permanent low-income affordable housing. Such an approach may face constitutional questions, given that it would be a requirement added to as-of-right property use, while the city under de Blasio passed Mandatory Inclusionary Housing (MIH) where certain percentages of rent-regulated housing is required when developers are able to take advantage of an upzoning to build bigger or higher.

Stringer criticized MIH and its use, saying de Blasio’s approach has “facilitated rezonings in a few cherry-picked neighborhoods and allows developers to build buildings that are bigger and higher than the rules would normally allow in exchange for setting aside 20 to 30 percent of new units as affordable housing,” and said that even the affordable units are not affordable enough to existing residents of the impacted communities and “out of reach” for most New Yorkers.

“Our affordable housing programs were meant to be an answer to New Yorkers being priced out of their homes,” Stringer said. “They were supposed to yield hundreds of thousands of affordable units. They were supposed to anchor communities against the growing costs of living in this city. Instead, they’ve reinforced unaffordability. Instead of solving the problem, we’ve made it worse.”

Mayor de Blasio has a different perspective, of course, and believes that his 12-year, 300,000-unit affordable housing plan, which has evolved over the years, is a very sound one, helping to preserve and build rent-regulated housing for people of a variety of income levels, and taking advantage of neighborhood zoning opportunities where local City Council members have been willing to negotiate. De Blasio’s office did not return a request for comment on Stringer’s speech and plan.

On Wednesday, Stringer made perhaps his most aggressive case yet that de Blasio’s housing plans are failing, especially with regard to how well they are attuned to the severity of the affordability crisis for low-income New Yorkers.

“To make sure these units are actually affordable,” Stringer explained of his universal affordable housing idea, “they should all be set at an average of 60% of the Area Median Income, or a household income of $58,000 a year for a family of three.” To avoid how development has spurred or reinforced segregation, the proposal applies to developments in all neighborhoods “whether it’s in the Upper East Side or in East Tremont.” 

“A framework of Universal Affordable Housing would set a new course for the much-needed integration of all our communities. In requiring affordable housing across all new buildings in all neighborhoods, we’re sending a strong and clear message that racial and economic diversity, in every corner of our city, across all zip codes, is paramount,” Stringer said. 

During his speech, Stringer emphasized eliminating the 421-a tax subsidy program that applies to certain developments in higher-value neighborhoods that include some affordable housing. “It costs taxpayers $1.6 billion a year, but four out of every five dollars actually supports market-rate development,” Stringer said Wednesday, speaking at the YM & YWHA of Washington Heights & Inwood in front of a crowd of supporters. “With greater flexibility to tailor benefits, including property tax abatements and capital subsidies, we can steer money to where it’s actually needed: to finance permanently affordable units.”

A number of affordable housing activists and advocates praised Stringer’s plan. “For years, New York City’s affordability crisis has spiraled, perpetuated by a status quo that relies on business as usual,” Jonathan Westin, Executive Director, New York Communities for Change, said in a statement accompanying the release of Stringer’s plan. “Comptroller Stringer’s plan upends our broken system that’s pricing working people out of our city--and barring them from putting down roots. We can’t allow taxpayers to continue to blindly fund the gentrification of our communities that’s pushing so many long-time residents out of the neighborhoods they helped build.”

Over the last five-plus years since de Blasio released his original Housing New York affordable housing plan, Stringer has been a regular critic. In the last two weeks, his office released an updated analysis showing “that the ‘affordable’ housing created by the plan is too expensive for at least 435,000 of the city’s lowest-income households,” and that only a third of newly constructed units in fiscal year 2019 were affordable for extremely low- or very low-income New Yorkers. 

In a stark departure from the de Blasio approach, Stringer is proposing that “all of our current housing capital subsidies should be used to build housing for extremely and very low-income families.”

The comptroller is also adding to his regular calls to leverage “1,000 vacant lots owned by the city” to provide housing for the city’s lowest-income families. The comptroller's office put out a report in 2018 that said the city’s Department of Housing Preservation and Development (HPD) is dragging its feet on developing the city-owned vacant lots. In response, HPD said the city is working on developing units, but that many of the lots are small or prone to flooding, which slows down the process and removes many from the buildable list, Curbed reported. Over several years, the city has stressed that it is moving as many publicly-owned vacant lots through the affordable housing pipeline as it can, and as quickly as possible.

In an effort to develop these lots, Stringer proposes creating a non-profit New York City Land Bank to “turn these vacant lots into sites that could generate tens of thousands of permanently affordable housing units for the lowest-income New Yorkers,” a plan that Stringer first suggested in 2016. The non-profit would take out long-term leases, which would allow the city to enforce affordability and keep costs low.

While the mayor's office did not respond to requests for comment on Stringer's speech, criticism of de Blasio, and new proposals, a spokesperson for de Blasio recently said in a statement to Gotham Gazette, "We are attacking the affordable housing crisis from all sides – from a record number of affordable homes to free lawyers for tenants facing eviction and rent freezes for the first time in history. In the past year alone, nearly half of all of the homes produced will serve the lowest income New Yorkers, and we will continue pushing to ensure there is housing for those who need it most."

Just after Stringer's speech, the city's Department of Housing Preservation and Development tweeted some crticism of the comptroller, saying, in part, "Comptroller Stringer's proposals would actually worsen New York City's housing crisis. They'd make it next to impossible to build new buildings and lock countless hard-working families out of homes they could actually afford."

Asked recently on WNYC's The Brian Lehrer Show about his approach to neighborhood rezonings, de Blasio said that his administration has often eyed areas of the city with more available land and willing local partners, but also said, "We have to create affordable housing everywhere if we're going to keep this city a city for everyone. And that means in neighborhoods that are more privileged and every kind of neighborhood." He stressed that the conversations can be challenging in more privelaged neighborhoods, but that "some of the rezonings coming up are in communities that have done pretty well for sure," perhaps referring to Gowanus, but tempered expectations for SoHo and NoHo and beyond, saying, "what I want to be very real about, in the next two years, is where are the things that we are absolutely certain there will be the support for in the ULURP process to get it done. Because I got two years to work urgently on these issues, Brian, and I'm going to put my energy in the places where I'm convinced we can get something done."

Stringer closed his Wednesday speech by addressing homeownership rates in New York City, which he pegged at 32% of housing and half of the rate of the rest of the country. Further, he added that less than 16% of home loans are granted to black and Hispanic borrowers despite the fact they make up the majority of the city’s population.

The comptroller’s plan aims to help increase homeownership rates by giving tenants the right of first refusal to buy their building when it goes up for sale, waving property transfer and mortgage recording taxes for qualified first-time homebuyers, and expanding programs like HomeFirst and HomeFix, to provide “moderate- and middle-income homeowners with up to $40,000 toward down payments and loans for home repairs,” Stringer said.

Some of the elements discussed Wednesday appeared in Stringer’s November 2018 housing plan, “NYC For All: The Housing We Need.” The plan sought to allocate $500 million in additional annual funding for extremely and very low-income housing, which included $375 million in capital costs and $125 million in operating subsidies. Stringer also suggested scrapping the mortgage recording tax and building on the city-owned vacant lots, just as this new plan says.

Stringer’s new plan adds the elements of universal affordable housing and completely redirecting all city capital dollars housing subsidies, among other planks.

“We came here today to ask one question. Who is New York City for?” Stringer said. “Our answer is loud and clear. This is your city, and your city cannot be bought.”

***
by Katie Kirker, Gotham Gazette

Read more by this writer.

Ben Max contributed to this article.

Note: this article has been updated with comments from de Blasio and the de Blasio administration.

City's New Office of Hate Crime Prevention Takes on Rise in Anti-Semitic Acts


de Blasio anti-semitism hate crimes

Mayor de Blasio, Deborah Lauter, & others (photo: Michael Appleton/Mayor's Office)


The past few years have seen a rise in hate crimes nationwide, and the trend has been the same in New York State and New York City, where the NYPD just reported a 20% increase in hate crimes, most of them anti-Semitic, in 2019 compared to 2018.

There were 428 reported hate crimes in New York City in 2019, 234 of them anti-Semitic, with the vast majority of those incidents of graffiti, including drawn swastikas, according to NYPD data. But there have also been a number of violent physical attacks, both in the city and nearby, particularly on identifiably Jewish New Yorkers in predominantly Jewish neighborhoods. The two most violent recent incidents in the area included the stabbing of five people in a Rabbi’s home in Rockland County during Hanukkah celebration, and a mass shooting in Jersey City targeting a Jewish deli where six people were killed, including the two shooters.

The rise in hate crimes, especially against Jews, has led to calls for more government action to both secure predominantly Jewish communities and to root out hate. At times facing criticism for not doing enough or acting quickly to meet the crisis, city and state officials have responded with a variety of measures. Those include greater police presence in certain areas, more security cameras and license plate readers, new school curriculum, neighborhood councils, and more.

Former City Council Member David Greenfield, an Orthodox Jewish leader from Brooklyn and now CEO of Met Council, and Deborah Lauter, executive director of the city’s new Office for the Prevention of Hate Crimes, recently joined the Max & Murphy podcast to discuss the rise in hate crimes in New York and what can be and is being done about it.

“The unconscionable crimes we’ve been seeing, which are murders and attempted murders that we’ve seen in both New Jersey and in Rockland County, New York, I think that it’s something that has everyone concerned and it has really created a tipping point right now where there is a discernible fear within the identifiably Orthodox Jewish community,” Greenfield said.

He said that people have been changing their behavior and that women especially have become more hesitant to walk around their neighborhoods alone.

Greenfield said Orthodox Jews and members of identifiably Jewish communities -- like those in Borough Park, Williamsburg, and Crown Heights -- really appreciate an increase in police presence in their neighborhoods.

“I always like to tell folks that Twitter is not real life. A lot of us like to spend time on Twitter and you’ll see someone on Twitter be critical. The handful of people who have criticized the increased police presence within the Orthodox Jewish community -- guess what? They don’t live in those communities, so I laugh at that,” Greenfield said. “People want more police presence, they want more safety, they want more visibility, they want more deterrence and more of an ability for the police to respond quickly to these crimes that are happening.”

Both Greenfield and Lauter, appearing consecutively, said that there is not one lone cause of the rise in hate crimes in New York. Lauter said there are “multiple layers that are giving rise to the expression of hate that we haven’t seen in a long time.”

Some of the factors Lauter referenced included extremist ideology, worsening rhetoric from elected officials, and kids not understanding the severity of their actions. Greenfield cited lack of education, mental health problems, and “good old fashioned” anti-Semitism as some contributing factors.

Therefore, Lauter said, “There’s not one way to fight this hate and respond. It’s going to take the law enforcement side, it's going to take community relations, and it's going to take education.”

“City Council and the mayor said enough of us just coming together and condemning incidents after the fact. Let’s do something more long-term and focus on preventative,” Lauter said in explaining the creation of her office and the work it has begun. Mayor Bill de Blasio announced Lauter as the Executive Director of a new Office for the Prevention of Hate Crimes in September 2019.

She said the office will soon include six staff members and be working with stakeholders across the city, but that because she was hired at such a crisis point given the explosion in hate crimes, she has been in something of a crisis mode since starting, with limited time for anything but triage.

Lauter explained some of her immediate and long-term plans, including education, use of working groups, and using restorative justice for some of those who commit acts of hate.

“I would like to see us create restorative justice programs that would really educate kids about the consequences of hate and acting out on hate and then potentially have them be peer leaders to others to share what they’ve learned instead of being a negative force in their communities,” Lauter said.

For the first time, she has brought 11 stakeholders, including the Department of Education and the New York Police Department, together to share ideas about how to address hate crimes and identify where there are gaps, she said. They are creating working groups to address different facets of hate crimes and trying to identify models that could create long-term change, Lauter added.

As of January 1, new bail reform laws have gone into effect, eliminating cash bail for many arrests, and the pre-trial detention that often came with it. Where hate crimes fit into the bail-eligible picture and the question of recidivism by those who commit hate crimes have been contentious flash points amid the increase in hate crimes and implementation of the new bail law. A number of officials and others have called for adding certain hate crimes to the bail-eligible list of offenses.

Greenfield is among them. He said this is an important part of the conversation about hate crimes, and that a judge should have the ability to remand someone who is going to get released and commit another violent hate crime “again and again and again.”

“When you see someone who gets arrested and should be remanded because of the history of violence towards people of a certain ethnicity, whether they be Jewish, African-American, Spanish, or LGBTQ and that person ends up on the street again. That is frustrating people,” Greenfield said, while stressing that he supports bail reform in general.

Like de Blasio, Lauter agrees that there should be judicial discretion in assessing dangerousness of a suspect, but she was cautious about saying that hate crimes have a high rate of recidivism. Lauter said she would like to see the data before making recommendations about how to proceed concerning hate crimes and bail reform.

Meanwhile, education has been part of the conversation on hate crimes as well, though often overshadowed by the policing and enforcement pieces (among other measures he’s either proposed or implemented, Governor Andrew Cuomo is calling for a new state “domestic terrorism” statue related to acts of hate). Greenfield said that topics focused on hate and diversity should be integrated into school curriculum, but highlighted how important real-life experiences in partnership with organizations, such as his own, can be to enlighten minds.

“That’s the kind of hands-on work where you start to see your neighbors through a different prism that shatters stereotypes that people have,” Greenfield said. “When you have these kinds of opportunities where you can work together, to me, that’s a lot more powerful than simply getting a lecture in one class once a year on the importance of diversity.”

Lauter said her office is also trying to increase educational opportunities for New Yorkers. She cited an example of how New York City Department of Education Chancellor Richard Carranza sent out a list of resources to 150,000 educators in an effort to increase “their commitment to step up their conversations with kids about what’s been going on with hate crimes and addressing them.”

Lauter added that she and Carranza brought a group of students from Brooklyn to the Museum of Jewish Heritage and announced they will be bringing 14,000 students and providing four free tickets to students families. This will help educate not only students, but their parents, which she believes is “critically, critically important.” (Governor Cuomo is proposing state funds to expand the museum and ensure more students are able to visit it.)

“This is not a right wing issue or a left wing issue, its an issue that permeates from every segment of society and it’s something we all have to deal with and we all have a responsibility to fight hatred and bigotry no matter where it comes from,” Greenfield said. “It’s incumbent upon all of us to say, OK, what can we do to make the situation better.”

[Listen to the full conversations with Greenfield and Lauter on the Max & Murphy podcast.]

***
by Katie Kirker, Gotham Gazette

Read more by this writer.



Print Friendly and PDF

Editor's Choice


Gotham Gazette: New York Voters Approve $4.2 Billion Environmental Bond Act
New York Voters Approve $4.2 Billion Environmental Bond Act
Gotham Gazette: 
New York City Voters Approve Racial Justice Ballot Measures
New York City Voters Approve Racial Justice Ballot Measures
Gotham Gazette: 
Housing Development in New York City Slows to a Crawl as Officials Debate Tax Incentives
Housing Development in New York City Slows to a Crawl as Officials Debate Tax Incentives
Gotham Gazette: 
City Council Examines Low Voter Turnout, Moving Local Elections to Even Years City Council Examines Low Voter Turnout, Moving Local Elections to Even Years