Gotham Gazette

The Place for New York Policy and politics

CITY

City

Party Primaries in Brooklyn Race for New City Council ‘Asian Opportunity’ District Come Down to the Wire


Susan Zhuang, Wai Yee Chan, Stanley Ng, Vito LaBella, Ying Tan (l-r)


Three Democrats and two Republican candidates are vying for their respective party nominations in this month’s primary election for the newly redrawn City Council District 43 in Southern Brooklyn.

The district was created last year during the redistricting process following the decennial Census to reflect population shifts, and in this case to give the Asian-American community a chance of greater, more proportionate representation in the Council. Asian New Yorkers were the largest and fastest-growing major demographic group in the city between the 2010 and 2020 Census counts.

The race in District 43 is one of only two open seats for the City Council this year, along with Manhattan’s District 9, and all 51 seats are on the ballot just two years after the previous citywide election. Not every City Council district is home to one primary election, much less two.

Early voting for the primary began Saturday and will go through June 25. Primary day is Tuesday, June 27, and absentee balloting is ongoing. (City Council Member Justin Brannan represents the outgoing District 43 and is running for reelection in the new District 47, where he will face the Republican nominee in the general  election — possibly Council Member Ari Kagan, the rep for the outgoing 47th district who left the Democratic Party in December and is running as a Republican.)

The new District 43 encompasses Bensonhurst, New Utrecht, and parts of Sunset Park and Dyker Heights. Almost 54% of the district’s population is Asian, according to the CUNY Mapping Service’s Redistricting & You project, while about 27.3% of residents are white and 15.3% are Hispanic. Almost all of the candidates across the two party primaries are of Asian descent.

More than half of voters in the district are registered Democrats, and just under 14% are Republicans, according to CUNY’s data. Nonetheless, in the 2021 mayoral election, Republican candidate Curtis Sliwa overwhelmingly won what is now the new district, receiving about 60.1% of votes in its lines, compared to 35.2% for Eric Adams, the Democrat who won overall. 

The District 43 race closely resembles last year’s contest for State Senate District 17, also a newly-created district that shares much of the same area. Iwen Chu, the Democratic candidate, won the hotly-contested general election, becoming the first Asian-American woman elected to the State Senate. 

The three Democratic candidates for District 43 include Susan Zhuang, chief of staff to Assemblymember William Colton; Wai Yee Chan, a former Brannan aide who is now executive director of Homecrest Community Services, a local nonprofit group; and Stanley Ng, a retired computer programmer and longtime education advocate.

The two Republican candidates, Vito LaBella and Ying Tan, both joined the race this spring and have been ramping up their campaigns since.

All five candidates are running on similar platforms, which has made the race competitive and captured voter attention, said Yiatin Chu, president of the Asian Wave Alliance (AWA), an advocacy organization dedicated to supporting Asian-Americans in New York. 

“The fact that districts like 43 have candidates that are making more people engaged and interested in elections is a really good thing,” Yiatin Chu said in a phone interview. “It’s a long game in terms of getting the Asian community to pay attention, to get engaged, to be registered, to go vote. Districts and races like this are what we need more of.” 

Overall, public safety and education remain the two top concerns for District 43 voters, she said. Because of the similarities in policy proposals, voters will also have to weigh how effectively they believe candidates could advocate for their positions once elected to the Council, she added. (The AWA endorsed Tan as its first-choice Republican candidate and LaBella as its second. The group has also endorsed Zhuang and Ng as its first- and second-choice Democratic candidates respectively.)

Republican Candidates

Vito LaBella 
LaBella, the only non-Asian candidate in the race, previously served as an NYPD officer for 31 years, rising to the rank of lieutenant. After retiring, LaBella became the president of the PTA of P.S./I.S. 187, a middle school in Borough Park that frequently sends high numbers of students to specialized high schools in the city. 

In 2018, LaBella protested against former Mayor Bill de Blasio’s proposal to eliminate the use of the Specialized High School Admissions Test (SHSAT) as the sole admissions criteria for the specialized high schools. The plan was an attempt to ensure greater diversity at the specialized high schools, where Black and Hispanic students are significantly underrepresented. But, it would have dramatically decreased the number of students taken from P.S./I.S. 187, LaBella said in an interview.

“The parents came to me, like, ‘Vito, can you help us?’” LaBella said. “I’m like, ‘Listen, I really didn’t sign up for this.’ But sometimes you choose your path, and sometimes your path chooses you.” 

LaBella also co-founded Parent Leaders for Accelerated Curriculum and Education (PLACE) NYC in 2019, an organization that similarly promotes the SHSAT as the sole criteria for admissions to specialized high schools and seeks to preserve the city’s Gifted & Talented programs, which de Blasio also sought to replace with an eye toward desegregation.

Last year, LaBella lost the State Senate election in District 17 by a few hundred votes to now-Senator Iwen Chu. She received 17,125 votes, while LaBella got 16,910. “My tenets are really just a continuation of my work from the Senate campaign but tweaked to focus on local issues,” he said. 

Like many of his opponents, LaBella’s campaign prioritizes quality education, as well as public safety and the success of small businesses — but he said his institutional knowledge distinguishes him from the other candidates.

In addition to his time as PTA president, LaBella has served on the District 20 Community Education Council for the past five years. He has advocated for the expansion of selective middle and high schools, work he said he could continue more effectively if elected to the City Council. 

“Quite frankly, even the CEC is advisory in nature,” LaBella said. “I’m running because I want to go to the next level, to try to bring a louder voice to the room for the things that I’ve been fighting for for the last five years.” 

With regards to public safety, LaBella said as a City Council member, he would also call out District Attorneys when they fail to prosecute aggressively enough.

“Violence interrupters, social services — whatever you want to do, try it all,” he added. “But when that doesn’t work, let’s arrest people. And let’s hold them accountable, especially the people who keep doing it again and again and again.” 

Though the Brooklyn Republican Party previously backed Chingkit “Jack” Ho, a candidate who has dropped out of the race, it has since endorsed LaBella. “We know that our candidate will do a very good job representing all constituents of the district,” said Ted Ghorra, the party’s chair, citing LaBella’s experience in policing and education.

“We try to pick candidates of any race for any district who are going to best represent the values and concerns of people in those districts,” Ghorra added. 

The New York Daily News reported in April that the Brooklyn GOP’s choice to endorse LaBella – who replaced Ho after he declined the nomination – upset some community leaders, who wrote a letter to Ghorra that urged him to rethink the decision. “This newly created district offers our community a chance for real representation, a chance to elect someone who understands and is able to meet our unique needs,” the letter stated. “This decision appears selfish and wholly opportunistic, and it should be seen as an insult to the Asian-Americans who form the majority in this district, for whom this district was created.”

Ghorra claimed (without evidence) that Asian-American Democrats planted the article out of concern about LaBella’s potential success in the general election. 

LaBella has also been endorsed by Sliwa, Republican Congressional Rep. Nicole Malliotakis, former Congressional Rep. and Republican gubernatorial candidate Lee Zeldin, City Council Member Inna Vernikov, former Governor George Pataki, the Brooklyn Conservative Party, and the Lieutenants Benevolent Association, among others. 

Ying Tan 
Tan, a first-generation immigrant from China who arrived in the United States in 2009, has spent the last seven years working in senior social services. Now, an item that sits near the top of her agenda is promoting protection for older New Yorkers — especially middle-class seniors, who are ineligible for benefits such as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). “The seniors who do not receive entitlements and are living with a fixed income — the middle class — they are the group of people most struggling from inflation,” she said in an interview.

Tan’s campaign also focuses on supporting small businesses and improving public safety and education. Specifically, she has plans to create a new tax bracket, allowing local business owners to pay less in taxes than they do now, and require their input on new city regulations. She also wants increased police funding, further implementation of community policing, a reversal of bail reforms passed by the State Legislature in 2019, and more accountability for district attorneys to ensure they are aggressive in enforcing laws.

Additionally, though Tan and LaBella have each emphasized education as a chief campaign concern, she stressed the breadth of her advocacy, which includes increased early intervention programs for students with special needs. Tan has a son who struggled with speech as a child, so she has learned first-hand the difficulty of accessing special needs programs, she said. 

And unlike LaBella, Tan argued that identity should factor into the elections. “I know the background, the culture, and the language,” she said of much of the new City Council district and its Asian majority. “He doesn’t know the values, he doesn’t know the background, [and] he doesn’t know the issues that we have in our community, so I don’t think he could well represent us.” 

Tan said she knows District 43 is home to many non-Asian communities but emphasized that the Asian community needs increased representation and support in government. “Our goal is to empower Asian voters and facilitate their integration into American culture,” she said. “We must prevent individuals from exploiting the underrepresentation of Asian voters.” 

“Both candidates, policy-wise, are very, very similar,” AWA’s Chu said of LaBella and Tan. “It was a matter of looking at what they’ve done for the community. Ying has strong roots by working in a senior center here in Bensonhurst, and people know her.” 

Still, Chu emphasized that AWA endorsed both candidates, a choice the organization doesn’t always make. “The registered Republicans that will be voting have got good choices,” she said. 

Democratic candidates

Susan Zhuang
A Chinese immigrant who moved to the U.S. in 2007, Zhuang was a volunteer for Assemblymember Colton before eventually becoming his chief of staff. She is running with Colton’s endorsement, which may be especially helpful in the parts of Bensonhurst that he represents in the Assembly.

Zhuang also has the backing of former City Council Mark Treyger, local district leaders, Asian Wave Alliance, good government group Citizens Union, and leaders of dozens of local nonprofit and business groups including the Chinese American Commerce Association, Bay Parkway Chinese Merchant Association, Asian Pacific Islander American Public Affairs Association and others.

Since she launched her campaign, Zhuang said she’s received an outpouring of support from district residents owing to her work in constituent services for Colton. But the challenge, she said, is ensuring that voter turnout is just as enthusiastic. “Now we need to make sure whoever supports me, comes out to vote,” she said in a recent phone interview.  

Zhuang’s top priorities mostly mirror other candidates – public safety, education, quality-of-life issues as well as affordable housing, language services, and small business services.  

In the last few months, while she has been campaigning, the state passed a new budget and the city is on the verge of passing its own. Both spending plans have surfaced key issues for Zhuang. While education funding is up in the state budget, there has been little movement on new affordable housing. And the city is poised to make cuts to early childhood education and senior services, both of which carry weight with District 43 residents, she said. 

Zhuang said that her appeal as a candidate goes beyond the Asian community, to the Jewish, Muslim, Italian, and Russian communities in the district. “It feels like I really can unite everyone together and fight for the issues we all care about,” she said.

Wai Yee Chan
Chan has lived in the city for 27 years, after being born and raised in Hong Kong. Though she has been a Queens resident for the last decade, she says she is moving back to Brooklyn at the end of the month regardless of the outcome of the primary. 

Chan’s professional career has largely been focused in the district and nearby. She has been a nonprofit executive for nearly 20 years and, in 2020, became the executive director of Homecrest Community Services, which provides services to older adults and families in the Asian community. She previously worked for Council Member Brannan as community engagement director and is also a member of the Language Assistance Advisory Committee of the citywide Civic Engagement Commission.

Chan has received a long list of prominent endorsements from elected officials including State Senators Chu, Andrew Gounardes, and John Liu, former Assembly Member Peter Abbate Jr., Council Member Brannan, nonprofit and business groups, and several major labor unions including 1199 SEIU (which ranked her first in a ranked-choice endorsement), the United Federation of Teachers (UFT), Professional Staff Congress – CUNY, NYC Deputy Sheriff’s Association, Uniformed Firefighters Association, Uniformed EMTs, Paramedics & Inspectors, New York State Court Officers Association, Uniformed Sanitationmen’s Association, and others. 

“I've been knocking on doors for months and months…and public safety, education, as well as affordable housing issues, that’s most of what I’ve heard for the past couple months,” Chan said in an interview. 

Chan also expressed concerns about the upcoming city budget, specifically proposed cuts to senior services such as Meals on Wheels. And she called for more funding to tackle hate crimes, which have risen in the last several years and have particularly affected Asian and Jewish communities, which make up large parts of the district. She said she wants more language and translation services to “streamline reporting [of hate crimes]” and “get the police’s attention right away instead of tedious reporting procedures.”

Her work for Brannan’s Council office is what sets Chan apart, she said. “I'm the one that has experience at the City Council and knows how the City Council functions,” she said. “So that's how I differentiate my background, my experiences with my two opponents.”

Stanley Ng
A retired computer programmer and member of the Citywide Council on High Schools, Ng proudly says he is not a member of the political establishment and does not run in Democratic political circles, even as he acknowledges that his independence makes for an uphill battle. “I am up against two people from two Democratic clubs. They have a lot more resources than I do. And I know I'm not going to be able to outrun them or outmuscle them, but I can outsmart them,” he said. 

“I am the best candidate because I’m the outsider,” he added. 

Ng also criticized the proposed cuts in the city budget put forward by Mayor Eric Adams, including the decrease in the Meals on Wheels program and a reduction of 500 school crossing guard positions, both part of negotiations with the current City Council over a budget due by the July 1 start of the new fiscal year. Though schools will be off for the summer after that, “When September starts, and you don't have all those guards in place, what are you going to do?” Ng wondered. 

It’s not just the safety of students that he worries about. Crime and public safety across the district remains his top priority. He has been particularly critical of bail reforms that the state Legislature approved in 2019, though the bail laws were tightened again in this year’s state budget. “It’s a start,” he said of those latest bail changes, which will ensure that more defendants are held on bail for both major crimes and low-level offenses. “Is it enough? I don’t know,” he said. “Until crime actually goes down, it’s hard to say.”

Read more about the Democratic candidates here, from Gotham Gazette’s initial reporting on the race.

***
by Julia Goldberg & Samar Khurshid
@GothamGazette

Boosting Arts and Access, City’s ‘Open Culture’ Program Set to Become Permanent by Law


May 25 rally for Open Culture (photo: Edward Amador/Office of Council Member Carlina Rivera) 


Under legislation passed in May by the New York City Council, the city’s pandemic-era Open Culture program, which allows arts and culture institutions to host events in public outdoor spaces throughout the city, will be renewed and made permanent. The bill, Intro. 590-A, passed with 47 votes in favor and just one against and awaits action by Mayor Eric Adams, though his administration has indicated its support.

The program aims to ensure cultural organizations can secure a wide variety of performance spaces and expand access to arts and culture throughout the city. According to the bill, it would be made permanent by August 1 under the purview of the Mayor’s Office of Citywide Event Coordination and Management, the Department of Cultural Affairs, and the Department of Transportation. 

The city established the Open Culture program on a temporary basis in March 2021, one year into the pandemic. It was critical to the survival of many institutions, said City Council Member Carlina Rivera, a Manhattan Democrat and the lead sponsor of the bill.

“It also allowed neighbors, families, and friends to come together in a safe way and made our communities more enjoyable and lively during a very harrowing time,” she said. 

Before the program sunset in March 2022, it enabled 489 public events to occur, according to Dawn Tolson, the executive director of the Mayor’s Office of Citywide Event Coordination and Management. Ballet, comedy, opera, and theater organizations all took advantage of Open Culture, hosting their rehearsals, classes, and performances outdoors, in part for more safety from COVID-19. There were nearly 200 available locations for events, and permits were expedited, with the Office of Citywide Event Coordination and Management responding to requests within five days of their submission. 

The City Council’s Committee on Cultural Affairs, chaired by Council Member Chi Ossé, a Brooklyn Democrat, first held a hearing on the proposed legislation in October 2022. At the hearing, Laurie Cumbo, Commissioner of the city’s Department of Cultural Affairs and, when she was in the Council through 2021, a co-sponsor of the legislation that established the initial program, spoke to its success in expanding opportunities for artists in the city and her excitement about its revival. 

“We want to work with the Council to realize the vision of having art in all of our communities and for it to be accessible,” Cumbo told the committee, which she previously chaired. “It’s got to be indoors. It’s got to be outdoors. And it’s got to be everywhere throughout the city.”

Tolson added that even after the end of the original Open Culture program, the city has supported many cultural organizations through a similar program, Open Streets, which provides local businesses and groups with access to outdoor spaces for events and activities. 

Lucy Sexton, the executive director of New Yorkers for Culture and Arts, a culture advocacy coalition, testified in support of the program’s renewal during the hearing. Sexton said it was the first and only permit program that allowed groups to generate income while providing the public with free access to the arts. Previously, organizations soliciting donations had to pay far more for commercial permits, she explained. 

Under Open Culture, Sexton’s organization held a street party in Lower Manhattan with performances by stilt walkers, spoken word artists, and dancers. Donor tickets cost $100, though the event was open to all. 

“Open Culture is a groundbreaking win-win for artists and cultural groups, for the public, and for the entire city,” she said. “Streets filled with music, dance, and community create safer, happier, healthier neighborhoods.” 

Marianna Newirth, a representative from New York Opera Alliance, a consortium of 45 opera companies, likewise testified in support.

“There is value in having opera be part of our everyday New York City life,” Newirth said, noting that under the Open Culture program, opera companies performed in multiple city parks, community gardens, and streets. “I ask you to maintain this program and ever-evolving ways to help us as we do our job as independent opera companies making opera accessible to all New Yorkers.” 

Several other artists and organizations also submitted written testimony that urged the committee to pass the legislation. 

Between the October hearing and the May vote, the Committee altered the bill to expand the eligibility requirement for arts and culture organizations, to designate all roadways — rather than only those in the Open Streets program — as viable performance spaces, and to add a clause that mandates an annual report of the program produced by the Office of Citywide Event Coordination and Management. 

The reports will provide clarity on the program’s reach, Rivera said in an interview. “If we saw Open Culture was not something that was happening in a community, we would want to find out why,” she said. “We want to find out if the local organizations feel supported and what we can change to improve the program.” 

The permit application fee also increased from $20 to $25. “The Mayor’s Office did want to create what we thought was a substantial and quite prohibitive fee — somewhere in the range of thousands of dollars, and that really isn’t the spirit of the program,” Rivera said. “We really did have to push back a bit.” There were no discussions about the fee during the October hearing at which Cumbo testified, and Cumbo did not suggest any specific changes to the bill during her testimony.

Outside of the permit application, participation in the program will remain free. 

Immediately preceding the City Council’s May vote, Rivera and others held a rally in Foley Square for Open Culture. Rivera commended the legislation, as did Council Members Ossé and Kevin Riley, a Bronx Democrat, and representatives from various arts and culture organizations. 

Sexton, who attended the rally, said in an interview that she was delighted when the legislation passed. “Open Culture is an acknowledgement by the city that culture is a vital part of our economy. I’m very appreciative of the city recognizing that,” she said. 

“I’m very, very excited to see this in the streets,” Rivera said.

Adams Administration Far Behind on Bus Infrastructure Benchmarks, with Promises to Improve This Year


Bus riders (photo: Michael Appleton/Mayoral Photography Office)


On the campaign trail and in City Hall, Mayor Eric Adams pledged to “build 150 miles of new bus lanes and busways in four years,” which he and supporters of the plan said would speed up the city’s notoriously slow buses, mitigate congestion, reduce traffic crashes, and protect the environment. 

“We will build more bus lanes to facilitate faster commuting,” Adams said in a speech to mark his first 100 days as mayor, in April 2022, “complete with countdown clocks so you know when the next one is coming.” It echoed sentiments from the Moving Forward Together agenda of Adams’ successful 2021 campaign, in which he stressed the importance of a “state-of-the-art bus transit system” in supporting economic development and revolutionizing the way New Yorkers move around the city. 

But nearly 18 months into his term, a series of public reports and hearings have indicated a process that is far behind schedule, keeping many of the city’s slow-moving buses stuck. While overall the MTA, a state-run authority, is in charge of the bus system, New York City government has control of city streets and thus where to install bus lanes and what kind, and the city and state work together on enforcement that can make or break whether bus lanes are clear of other vehicles.

Buses crawl around New York City at an average of 9 miles per hour, according to a March 2023 report from New York State Comptroller Tom DiNapoli’s office, meaning they are often moving even slower during rush hours. The vast majority of bus riders are low- and middle-income New Yorkers of color. According to Bronx City Council Member Pierina Sanchez, buses on the BX12 route in her district can drive as slowly as 4-8 miles per hour. 

“You can almost walk or speed-walk down faster than [the 12 bus] down Fordham Road during peak hours,” she told DOT officials at a May 19 city budget hearing.

Mayor Adams rode the bus and made an appearance at a "better buses" rally hosted by advocates in Brooklyn in August 2022, just over seven months into his tenure. At the rally he recommitted to speeding up the city's buses and building out the bus lane capacity he had pledged.

"Buses are the transportation backbone of our city," the mayor said, according to a transcript from his office. "They reach every corner of our city, every borough, and then a lifeline for so many New Yorkers on how we utilize our service." He called the bus "the great equalizer," and a place where New Yorkers "cross-pollinate with the diversity of this amazing city," but also stressed that "buses serve a lower income community — that's the largest population that uses it," and that no matter who you are, "you want a level of consistency in this operation."

He stressed his "commitment to advancing 150 bus lanes in four years," calling it "important."

But many months later, frustration over the Adams administration’s lack of progress on the city’s buses, ridden by around 1.4 million New Yorkers per weekday during the first quarter of 2023, according to the MTA, has made transportation advocates more skeptical of his promises.

Just before a state budget deal was reached, Adams endorsed a proposed pilot program championed by Assemblymember Zohran Mamdani and State Senator Michael Gianaris, both Queens Democrats, and other legislators that would make 10 New York City bus routes free for commuters (the budget deal included five, one in each borough, to be determined by the MTA with public input). In response to the mayor’s endorsement of the free-bus pilot idea, Philip Miatowski, senior director of policy and research at nonprofit advocacy group Transportation Alternatives, warned to “be wary of any electeds who claim to support free buses from a budget they don’t control while having little to show over what they do control: bus lane mileage.” 

With a state budget deal in place, attention has now shifted to the city’s own budget process, with a spending plan due by the July 1 start of the new fiscal year. Part of what advocates, elected officials, and bus riders are concerned about with the mayor’s approach to buses is management of his own Department of Transportation, including funding and personnel, as well as directives to better execute on promises already made.

Current Status of Busways and Bus Lanes
In 2019, the City Council passed and then-Mayor Bill de Blasio signed into law the Streets Plan, which required the construction of 20 miles of camera-protected bus lanes in 2022 and 30 miles of the same in each of 2023, 2024, 2025, and 2026, for a total of 140 miles over five years.

According to the New York City Department of Transportation’s update to the mandated Streets Plan released in February, the city completed just 7.7 miles of new bus lanes in 2022, meaning just over 5% of the mileage needed to reach Adams’ own benchmarks and falling well short of the requirements in the Streets Plan law itself.

According to the Tri-State Transportation Campaign, New York City had a total of 138 bus lane miles as of November 2022. 

Meanwhile, no new busways, which heavily restrict non-bus traffic on stretches of city roadway, have been completed since Adams took office. Three busways built during de Blasio’s second term were given permanent status, but two of them, the Flushing Main Street busway and the Jamaica Avenue busway, had their 24 hours of operation reduced under Adams — to 6am to 7pm and 6am to 8pm, respectively.

As of March 2023, busways are maintained on Archer Avenue in Queens, Jamaica Avenue in Queens, 181st Street in Manhattan, Jay Street in Brooklyn, 14th Street in Manhattan, Fulton Street in Brooklyn, and Main Street in Queens. The only busway listed as being “in development” by a DOT-provided list is for a stretch of Fifth Avenue between 34th and 57th Streets in Manhattan, which is part of a major Adams administration plan for the avenue. A planned busway on Fordham Road in the Bronx was just canceled, accordjng to Streetsblog, by DOT after pressure from local business leaders.

Of the 7.7 miles of bus lanes that the DOT completed since Adams took office through the end of 2022, only 4.2 miles are covered by camera enforcement, according to a DOT official. Those cameras film vehicles that illegally drive, park, or stand in bus lanes in order to automatically issue tickets. The Streets Plan criteria only counts camera-protected bus lanes in its benchmarks mileage.

The recently-approved state budget also expanded bus lane camera enforcement, giving the MTA and city more freedom to issue tickets for offenders. According to the legislation, drivers caught parking or driving in bus lanes and bus stops will be charged with a $50 fine on the first offense, with an additional $50 assessed for each additional infraction to a maximum of $250 within a 12-month period. The MTA announced plans to equip a total of 1,000 buses with on-board cameras by the end of the year.

DOT Commissioner Ydanis Rodríguez, a former City Council member from Upper Manhattan appointed to lead DOT by Mayor Adams, acknowledged the situation at a February 14 hearing before the New York City Council Committee on Transportation. “The two areas that we are behind are the bike lanes and bus lanes,” he said. “As the Commissioner and a previous Council Member, I ask for your support and leadership to help me accomplish these goals.” 

At a May 19 budget hearing, DOT First Deputy Commissioner Margaret Forgione told City Council members that DOT was preparing for summer and fall construction on bus priority projects — mainly new bus lanes and bus lane enforcement — along University Avenue, Gun Hill Road, and Fordham Road in the Bronx, Northern Boulevard in Queens, Livingston Street in Brooklyn, and 3rd Avenue in Manhattan. 

Nonetheless, DOT officials were unable to provide numbers on bus lane progress to date in 2023, which Rodriguez and Forgione said was due to the seasonal nature of the construction process.

“We have just entered our installation season,” Forgione explained. “We can’t lay down markings or do much of our asphalt work in the wintertime, so we are just beginning implementation and it would be better for us to update you in just a little bit on all the projects that are underway.” 

Asked by Brooks-Powers when they would catch up to their missed 2022 benchmarks, Rodriguez offered few specifics. “We feel that 2023 will be a good year,” he said. “We have many projects, some of which are in front of many of you council members.”

Reactions to Progress on Bus Lanes and Busways
When Adams rolled out his bus plans early last year, public transit advocates like the Bus Turnaround Coalition expressed strong support and eagerly offered cooperation. But as actual implementation failed to gain momentum, many of the same groups have been scathing in their criticism.

“Mayor Adams promised millions of riders that he would speed up the nation’s slowest bus system with 150 new bus lanes over four years,” said Riders Alliance Executive Director Betsy Plum, responding to Adams’ State of the City Address in February of this year. “So far, we’ve seen barely more than we can count on one hand. The administration must pick up its own pace so bus riders can pick up ours.” 

Riders Alliance publishes a Bus Lane Tracker, which attests that only 6.8 miles out of the promised 150 miles of new bus lanes under Mayor Adams have been completed. 

The 0.9 mile discrepancy with DOT’s number comes from Riders Alliance not counting Main Street in Flushing, El Grant Highway, and Pelham Bay Park, the first two of which Riders Alliance Digital Strategist Derrick Holmes says are not completed bus lanes, even if they have been “enhanced” in 2022. According to Holmes, Pelham Bay Park was also excluded because it constitutes “100ft of ‘busway’ that didn’t feel like a significant/reportable improvement given the double-digit bus lane mile deficit DOT is already in.” 

The stagnation has also displeased several members of the Council’s transportation committee, including Chair Brooks-Powers. “It is clear that the DOT is not doing what is required by law to build and upgrade street infrastructure citywide,” she told Gotham Gazette in a statement earlier this year. “We can and must do more to redesign dangerous roadways with hard infrastructure investments.” 

The City Council’s frustration was evident at the February 14 hearing, where DOT Commissioner Rodríguez, DOT Deputy Commissioner Eric Beaton, DOT Assistant Commissioner for Intergovernmental and Community Affairs Rick Rodriguez, and DOT Director of Safety Policy Julia Kite-Laidlaw all faced sharp questioning.

Asked by Council Member Gale Brewer to affirm under oath if DOT could meet its 2023 benchmarks, Rodríguez declined to make any promises, instead stressing his department’s focus on quality over quantity and prioritizing higher-need neighborhoods in a time when staffing shortages and supply-chain issues are limiting its capabilities. 

“We’re going to work to the best of our ability to meet those targets,” added Beaton. “But we want to make sure we’re not just guided by the number of miles, but also doing the projects that are most impactful for the highest number of people.” 

“Alright, I got it,” Brewer interjected. “I don’t agree with your answer, but I understand.” 

Rodriguez appeared to be more confident of hitting 2023 Streets Plan benchmarks in the May 19 budget hearing, telling the Transportation and Finance committees that DOT was on track to meet its annual targets. “Thanks to Mayor Adams’ commitment to putting his money where his word is,” he stated, “DOT has all the resources that we need for us to do the job, weather permitting.” 

But he continued to add the same cautionary note to his answers as in previous hearings, stressing that DOT was considering both quantity and quality, as well as community approval, in implementing bus priority projects. Rodriguez furthermore indicated that DOT has to account for open streets and outdoor restaurant seating, which was not included in the Streets Plan that passed in 2019. 

DOT Staffing Shortages 
At the February 14 hearing and in other settings, Rodríguez cited supply chain delays and staffing shortages as obstacles to meeting goals on bus lanes and busways, though he has more recently emphasized the lack of support from elected officials and communities as the most significant challenge.

Council Member Lincoln Restler, a Brooklyn Democrat, expressed alarm over the 750 staff vacancies across DOT, a problem he said was exacerbated by the Adams administration’s policy of deliberately preventing hiring to save money. DOT currently employs just over 5,500 people. 

“I am deeply troubled by this administration’s commitment to financial austerity and shrinking the size of government at the expense of achieving the goals you’re espousing,” Restler told Rodríguez in February. 

Since taking office, Mayor Adams has issued repeated directives for city agencies to cut their budgets, often clashing with City Council members and other government officials in the process, including by eliminating some of the many thousands of budgeted personnel vacancies. By many accounts, the mayor had also been slow to adjust hiring and retention policies in order to staff agencies, exacerbating a challenge he inherited from the prior administration and hurting the service-delivery performance of city government. According to Streetsblog, DOT operations continued to suffer from a mass exodus of staff and low morale among those who have remained.

Council members anxious about DOT’s staffing problems may have found some comfort from the mayor’s abandonment of a policy that authorized city agencies to make just one hire for every two vacant positions. According to DOT Deputy Executive Commissioner Paul Ochoa, DOT was “keeping up with attrition” and had commitments from City Hall that “if we get to a point where we fill our vacancies, then we’ll start having conversations about bringing in more budgeted headcount.” 

At the May 19 budget hearing, Ochoa testified that a recent sprint in hiring by the Adams administration has enabled the department to better keep up with attrition, losing on average one employee for every two than they hire. “Since March, we’ve had almost 150 hires and 75 separations,” he said. 

“I’m happy to see that there’s some modest forward momentum,” Restler responded.

Rodríguez, citing DOT efforts to create hiring pipelines through job fairs and partnerships with institutions like City College, promised that his department was committed to filling the vacancies as best they could in a tight labor market for engineers and planners.

At a City Council hearing on the mayor’s $102.7 billion preliminary budget held on March 9, Rodríguez also suggested that DOT was struggling to compete with the private sector, which tends to offer higher salaries and more generous benefit packages, as well as more flexible hybrid and work-from-home schedules. Mayor Adams has until recently insisted that all city employees work in-person every day, no matter their roles. Small flex-schedule pilot programs have been launched for two city agencies earlier this month, but not yet at DOT.

Rodriguez has maintained that DOT retains support from Adams, who he said promised an additional $370 million in capital funding – 18% of DOT’s budget – for streetscape improvements and safe street designs “We’re fine with the resources that we have,” he told the committee. “Any additional resources are always welcome.”

“You’re fine with the resources you have,” Brooks-Powers responded, “but also there are challenges with the resources and implementation of policy because the staffing is not there…am I following it correctly?” 

Rodríguez argued that DOT had to be satisfied with what they could get under the circumstances. “New York City has limited resources,” he said. “There is not a tree where we can just take all the dollars from there. We have limited resources for agencies to get what they need and do their jobs, so what I’m saying is that I’m comfortable with the investment that Mayor Adams has made with our agency.” 

On April 26, Adams released his executive budget for fiscal year 2024, which includes $1.41 billion allocated to DOT, a marginal (0.3%) increase from the $1.4 billion budgeted in the preliminary plan presented in January. While Rodriguez maintained his satisfaction with the number, Brooks-Powers was more skeptical. “I question whether an executive budget that includes $27.9 million in PEGs in FY 2024 will have a negative impact on our shared goals for better, safer transportation citywide,” she said in her opening statement at the May 19 budget hearing, referring to the mayor’s budget savings efforts, known as a Program to Eliminate the Gap, or PEG.

Community Support and Opposition 
Rodríguez requested support and leadership from the City Council in overcoming community opposition to traffic safety projects on several occasions. “Our team had a plan on how to accomplish those numbers in 2023,” he said in the February 14 hearing, of the Streets Plan’s bus and bike lane benchmarks. “But one challenge that we face is that when we go to communities, there is major opposition to our plans to bring in bus lanes and bike lanes.” (“I was supportive,” Brewer offered.) 

Historically, local concerns have been especially prevalent in areas where residents have traditionally relied heavily on cars. One 2015 proposal for an expanded bus lane on 125th Street had drawn fire at community board meetings, with the chair of CB 10 complaining about new bus infrastructure slowing down her taxi commute. “There’s still a very entrenched car culture in this city,” said then-Council Member Mark Levine, a Manhattan Democrat. “For years, the car has been king, and that’s how we made policy.” Then-Council Member Rodriguez, for his part, maintained that “anything that will help move our buses safe and faster is something we’ll support.” 

There are several recent examples to support his point.

Bronx City Council Member Oswald Feliz claimed in a June 2022 letter to Rodriguez that using Fordham Road as a proposed busway would “force thousands of cars onto nearby alternative, residential streets, creating endless gridlock and danger for pedestrians.” Riders Alliance spokesman Danny Pearlstein responded in StreetsBlog that “NIMBY drivers are back at it, yet again spreading tired falsehoods to deny tens of thousands of Bronxites faster and more reliable bus commutes.” Construction of the Fordham Road busway has not yet begun. 

Elsewhere, Queens Council Member Nantasha Williams had suggested ending the pilot period for the busway on Jamaica Avenue, alleging at a June 2022 Council transportation committee hearing that in building bus infrastructure, DOT does not assess its impact on businesses and other drivers. Brooks-Powers joined Williams in expressing reservations about the way the Jamaica Avenue busway was implemented, telling StreetsBlog that people could not access local businesses. As of March 2023, the Jamaica Avenue busway is still on pilot status. 

Brooks-Powers contended that concerns over certain bus lanes and busways were based on flawed execution rather than opposition to bus infrastructure on principle.

“It’s not that members do not want [bus and bike lanes] in their communities,” she told Rodríguez. “It’s that they want to have the community at the table in a really meaningful way to implement this.” Some areas, she said, saw new infrastructure sprout up without any community input, including a raised, unprotected bike lane in Far Rockaway that has been used more often as a parking space for cars than for bike-riding. Other areas, Brooks-Powers pointed out, did request bus and bike lanes but were not provided any investment by DOT.

Williams echoed Brooks-Powers and took the point further. “I have said on the record multiple times that it is unfortunate that the Queens Boulevard bus lane doesn’t come down to Jamaica, and so I understand your commentary around it not being popular,” she said. “But I don’t think that is where we should stop. We should work together to educate the community and make sure that there is even just connectivity to a bus lane that doesn’t come down to Jamaica Avenue or other areas of the district that might be more appropriate versus arbitrarily slapping down a bus lane and then getting upset if the community doesn’t like it.”

Other council members offered more unreserved support for bus priority projects in their districts. “Come to District 33,” Restler told the Commissioner. “I am here to help. We will build every bike lane, every dedicated busway across the city of New York. We are here for it, we love it.” 

Community responses have indicated broad approval for new bus infrastructure in their neighborhoods. In a poll commissioned by DOT in Bronx Community Boards 5, 6, and 7, 66% of respondents expressed support for additional bus lanes on Fordham Road, and 70% for a busway. One citywide survey by Siena College taken from December 2020 had a majority (56%) of respondents supporting the installation of new bus lanes, even at the cost of some parking space.

Bus Infrastructure and Street Safety
The urgency of quickly installing new bus infrastructure as a safety measure was underscored at the February 14 hearing by testimony from several family members of people killed in traffic violence — there were 255 such deaths citywide in 2022 and 273 in 2021. According to Transportation Alternatives, 51 people have been killed in crashes during the first quarter of 2023. 

Families for Safe Streets member and Bronx resident Monique Williams, whose father was fatally struck by a driver in 2020, told the committee that more protected bus and bike lanes would help lower the death toll. “These are things that we know will calm traffic down and encourage people to drive more carefully,” she said. “It makes it possible for people to safely commute and reduce senseless crashes, and it saves lives.”

Amy Cohen, another FSS member whose 12-year old son was killed by a car driver in 2013, called on the City Council to pressure DOT to move more rapidly, fulfill its NYC Streets Plan commitments, and employ safety measures on dangerous streets and intersections. “We need every Council member to champion those proven safety measures,” she said, “and not be impediments to change when a small group of residents think their parking space is more critical than the lives of residents in their district.”

In testimony delivered to the Council transportation committee on March 9, Transportation Alternatives Senior Director of Advocacy & Organizing Elizabeth Adams called the sluggish pace of bus lane construction “unacceptable,” emphasizing the disproportionate effects of traffic violence and congestion on New Yorkers who are low-income, younger, and people of color, who tend to have longer commutes and fewer mobility options.

“New York’s traffic-clogged and dangerous streets cost residents more than $6 billion a year in traffic crashes and lost time,” she said. “We leave money on the table when we fail to build safe and equitable street space.”

***
by Nicholas Liu, Gotham Gazette

Read more by this writer.



Print Friendly and PDF

Editor's Choice


Gotham Gazette: New York Voters Approve $4.2 Billion Environmental Bond Act
New York Voters Approve $4.2 Billion Environmental Bond Act
Gotham Gazette: 
New York City Voters Approve Racial Justice Ballot Measures
New York City Voters Approve Racial Justice Ballot Measures
Gotham Gazette: 
Housing Development in New York City Slows to a Crawl as Officials Debate Tax Incentives
Housing Development in New York City Slows to a Crawl as Officials Debate Tax Incentives
Gotham Gazette: 
City Council Examines Low Voter Turnout, Moving Local Elections to Even Years City Council Examines Low Voter Turnout, Moving Local Elections to Even Years