Coastal resiliency project underway (photo: Michael Appleton/Mayoral Photography Office)
Update: The City Council approved the Citywide Climate Adaptation Plan legislation on Thursday, October 7.
After Hurricane Ida once again exposed New York City’s vulnerability to major climate events, the New York City Council is set to pass, and Mayor Bill de Blasio is expected to sign, a bill that will mandate the creation of a new “citywide climate adaptation plan.”
The Council will vote on Thursday to approve the legislation, Intro. 1620, which was first introduced in June 2019 by Brooklyn Council Member Justin Brannan, chair of the Committee on Resiliency and Waterfronts, and then Queens Council Member Costa Constantinides, who left office earlier this year.
The bill will require the Mayor’s Office of Long-Term Planning and Sustainability to oversee the development of and publicly release an initial, holistic plan addressing the risks that climate hazards pose to the city, including extreme storms, rising sea levels, tidal flooding, flood surges, wildfire, and extreme heat, precipitation, and wind. The first plan will be due by September 30, 2022, with mandated updates every ten years.
“The climate adaptation plan would include recommendations for resiliency and adaptation measures to protect residents, property and infrastructure in the City,” according to the bill summary. It would also need to “identify areas that are highly vulnerable to climate hazards to help determine where resiliency and adaptation measures should first be implemented” while also analyzing the “potential impact on environmental justice areas.”
Past and current mayoral administrations have already sought to prepare for the long-term threat of climate change and its impact on severe weather. In 2007, Mayor Michael Bloomberg released PlaNYC, a strategic plan that looked ahead at the city’s evolving needs till 2030, including climate resiliency. Mayor de Blasio’s update to the plan is called OneNYC, envisioning through 2050 how the city would grow and adapt. Part of that was preparing for climate change, including by ending the city’s reliance on fossil fuels, building resilient infrastructure, and environmental justice reforms.
There are also other old and new plans, such as resiliency efforts de Blasio announced in the wake of recent storms, including a new blueprint for preparing for and responding to extreme weather events, with $2.7 billion in new funding to accelerate climate-resilient infrastructure projects.
But the bill the City Council is set to pass this week is the first “soup to nuts” attempt at putting all those plans in one basket, Brannan says. “I’m very aware that we’re going to be celebrating the passage of a giant to-do list,” he said in a phone interview. “We should be celebrating the passage of a whole bunch of projects that need to get done. But the fact is, this has never been done before really in a comprehensive way. And it’s crazy that it’s never been done before.”
When the bill was first introduced, it only envisioned a plan to aid shoreline communities and steps to mitigate flooding and damage to homes and infrastructure in flood zones. But the recent thunderstorms in August and September proved that it’s not only those communities that bear the brunt of climate events.
Tropical depression Henri flooded the city with record-high rains and brought the subway system to a standstill. Soon after that, Hurricane Ida poured even greater amounts of rain on the city and caused mass flooding across the city, killing 15 people, mostly in Queens and inland. People drowned in basement units in districts that are landlocked, leading to broad outcry that the city had failed to prepare for the effects of adverse weather events in the nine years since Hurricane Sandy.
“We basically Frankensteined the bill over the past couple of weeks,” Brannan said. “We made it much stronger than it was. Fifteen New Yorkers died during Ida. That isn’t something we can ever let happen again. We felt like getting this bill done was now or never.”
Though the city has spent the time since Sandy undertaking resiliency upgrades and infrastructure improvements, most have been slow to materialize. Capital projects are still chronically delayed and over budget. Federal funding, which the city often relies on for major infrastructure projects, tends to be doled out after disasters have already occurred. The city received $15 billion in federal aid to improve climate disaster preparedness in 2013 but, by 2019, had only spent about 54% of it. Brannan’s bill would envelope all of those efforts.
“You need a plan that from Riverdale to Rockaway is gonna look at all this stuff in a holistic way, and I think what this creates is a mapped out plan that would show what needs to be done to protect every community,” Brannan said.
At a recent City Council hearing after Ida, Brannan and other committee chairs pressed officials from the de Blasio administration about the city’s preparedness. “I think I went into it and I left it with the same idea, which is that we’re just not remotely ready for the next superstorm,” Brannan said of the hearing, in an interview on the Max Politics podcast. “For me, it proved what a lot of us had been saying: that the city hasn’t really accomplished very much outside of lower Manhattan in the years since Hurricane Sandy.”
A spokesperson for the Mayor’s Office of Climate Resiliency said the administration supports Brannan’s amended “citywide climate adaptation plan” legislation, indicating that de Blasio will sign it into law. It will largely fall to the next administration, a new mayor is due to take office January 1, to craft the plan and the next City Council to provide oversight of its development and implementation.
“Extreme rainfall from the remnants of Hurricane Ida tragically underscored how flooding threatens inland areas as well as coastal neighborhoods, and we also know that extreme heat remains a deadly climate threat facing New Yorkers,” said Phil Ortiz, the mayoral spokesperson. “We look forward to releasing a citywide resiliency plan that will consider the full range of climate hazards impacting New York City.”
***
by Samar Khurshid, senior reporter, Gotham Gazette
@samarkhurshid @GothamGazette
The new Brooklyn Bright bike lane (photo: Ed Reed/Mayoral Photography Office)
The administration of Mayor Bill de Blasio is putting the final touches on its efforts to combat climate change and create a more sustainable city, with significant short- and long-term challenges at play, major decisions to be made in the mayor’s final months in office, and questions about its policy choices.
Ben Furnas, the director of the Mayor’s Office of Climate and Sustainability, points to key accomplishments of the last several years as well as new announcements and upcoming areas where the de Blasio administration is looking to make progress before handing over the reins to the next mayor on January 1.
Furnas recently appeared on the Max Politics podcast from Gotham Gazette at the end of Climate Week 2021 to discuss the administration’s policies — some of them landmark achievements like regulations around harmful carbon emissions from big buildings, a leading polluter — and what comes next.
Furnas explained that his office is dedicated to fundamentally changing the city by examining where New Yorkers use fossil fuels and contribute to global warming and enacting policies to reduce carbon emissions from buildings, transportation, waste management, and other key sectors in the discussion. He said that addressing climate change writ-large includes tackling immediate issues like air quality and use of public space, touted some of the administration’s top programs to create a more livable city now and for years to come, hinted at some of what might be coming in these final months of the administration, and discussed big picture goals that the next mayor should take on.
Two big goals that the city has already set: making New York City carbon-neutral by 2050 and powering all of the city government’s electricity needs with renewable energy by 2025.
Furnas pointed to the importance of Governor Kathy Hochul’s September 20 announcement that the state awarded contracts to build new transmission lines delivering clean energy from Upstate and Canada to New York City. He said that this influx of wind, solar, and hydropower will provide 100% of the city government’s electricity needs, especially making a difference for communities adjacent to power generation sites. The de Blasio administration has pledged to have all of city government powered by clean energy in the next four years.
“Climate is an existential generational crisis facing us all,” Furnas said, adding that “environmental justice” is one key “imperative that drives us.”
“It’s this concept that we can be using climate action and sustainability action to improve the lived experience of folks in neighborhoods that might have traditionally been left out both of a lot of the planning processes and have environmental outcomes that are not where they need to be — the air is too dirty, there’s too much exposure to either hazards or infrastructure that they don’t appreciate having to live nearby,” Furnas told host Ben Max. “And there’s obviously a really sour and bleak history of the racial dynamics of a lot of these things so this is the desire to have our sustainability and climate action both be improving our city for the future but also correcting inequities in the here and now.”
To that end, Furnas said that his office is helping spearhead the development, with public input, of an “environmental justice for all” plan that will continue into the next administration.
During the conversation, Furnas boasted several city policies and programs aimed at a carbon neutral future and more livable city. ElectrifyNYC, for example, is a brand new initiative helping 1-4 family homes to electrify heating systems, put solar panels on roofs, and improve insulation. Furnas said that the program targets low- and mid-income families in Staten Island and Queens but that all New Yorkers should look into it.
The “NYC accelerator” program is back after a COVID-19 hiatus, according to the city’s website. Furnas lauded the program, which offers free guidance for New Yorkers looking to make cost-saving, energy-efficient home upgrades. The city has also expanded, Furnas highlighted, its “carbon challenge,” where institutions and landlords voluntarily commit to even deeper carbon emission reductions to showcase how aggressive targets are possible. Columbia University, NYU, Mount Sinai Health System, Google, Goldman Sachs, and StuyTown Property Services are just some of the over 100 participating universities, hospitals, and corporate entities to take the challenge.
That challenge builds on a major new law in the city that de Blasio signed after the City Council passed it in 2019, a key piece of what the mayor has called the city’s own “Green New Deal.”
The Climate Mobilization Act is multi-pronged, including requirements for new buildings or buildings undergoing roof renovations to install solar panels or green roofs. It also modified how buildings’ energy efficiency ratings are calculated and provides low-interest financing for climate conscious building upgrades. The most aggressive component of the Act is Local Law 97.
That law, which Furnas spoke of proudly during the podcast, will require increasingly strict limits on greenhouse gas emissions for most buildings over 25,000 square feet by 2024, or the building owners must pay fines. Furnas estimates that the law covers about 50% of the built environment in New York City and is a key piece of the city’s goal to hit carbon neutrality by 2050.
Furnas said the city is also working to get smaller buildings to move toward cleaner energy use and fewer emissions, with several programs available, and that he is hopeful most of the larger buildings will comply with the emissions targets instead of paying the fines.
“It’s worth the investment,” Furnas said. “It’s worth the work, not just because we’re facing an existential threat, not just because there's this big scary law that threatens fines if you don't do this work, but because they can really both make a business case and a quality of life case for the workers in their buildings, the tenants in their buildings, to improve these systems and burn a lot less fossil fuels and do a lot better by way of the climate.”
For many City Council members and advocates, the next major policy priority to help the city meet essential climate goals is the passage of Intro. 2317, which would in essence ban new gas hook-ups in the city, thus ensuring the use of electric heating and cooking, and helping to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. The bill is sponsored by Brooklyn Council Member Alicka Ampry-Samuel and co-sponsored by about half the members of the City Council, but has not advanced yet and Mayor de Blasio has been lukewarm about it.
But, Furnas appeared to give a shot in the arm to proponents of the bill, reiterating that the mayor believes it makes sense to impose a date on when new development can’t use fossil fuels, but it’s a matter of negotiating the specifics with the City Council.
“We are broadly supportive of this,” Furnas said. “We really look forward to working with the City Council to get this done. I think if you look at the state and federal level and you look at the direction the industry is going, I think everybody agrees that the buildings of the future are ones that don’t rely on fossil fuels.”
As for a timeline, Furnas cited the International Energy Agency’s “narrow but achievable path” for emissions reductions and its recommendation to stop constructing buildings that rely on fossil fuels for heating after 2025.
“Any building that we build shouldn’t be one that we’ll need to retrofit later,” Furnas said.
He went on to say that about one third of the city’s emissions come from “under the hoods of our cars and trucks,” prompting his office and the mayor to push for interventions like protected bike lanes and high quality bus service. Furnas also cited a recent $75 million investment in new electric vehicles that will go toward everything from sedans to ambulances to retrofitting existing diesel powered vehicles. He said that the city has among the lowest per capita carbon emissions in the country and that the subway above all is his “favorite electric vehicle.”
“The best transit system is one where people don’t think about it very much,” Furnas said. “That type of transformation is really possible.”
Furnas mentioned that the city has made a “transformational set of investments” that would electrify vehicles and reimagine streets. The new bike lane on the Brooklyn Bridge, which opened on September 14 in place of one lane formerly dedicated to automobiles, is one of the most recent examples where the city is trying to move people out of cars and into more sustainable, green transportation.
Transit is a centerpiece of a great deal of climate action. Transportation Alternatives, a nonprofit group, and its allies recently launched “25x25,” an effort to see that 25% of street space in New York City is turned into “space for people” by 2025. Transportation Alternatives’ website elaborates, explaining that space for people entails improved bike and bus lanes, pedestrianizing streets, and safer intersections among other improvements.
Appearing on an early September episode of Max Politics alongside two other experts and advocates to discuss climate and resilience in the wake of Hurricane Ida, Transportation Alternatives Executive Director Danny Harris said that a key issue when it comes to the built environment is that 75% of New York’s streets are devoted to moving and storing vehicles while a minority of New Yorkers own a car. Electric vehicles are not the answer either, Harris argued, since they too, take up space that could be used for walking, biking, greenery, and other things.
“From our perspective, no amount of death, whether it’s a child crossing the street or a superstorm, seems to be enough to move our elected officials to inconvenience a few drivers and take away this incredibly precious asset that we have, which is street space, and start to repurpose it for all New Yorkers,” Harris said.
During that same show, ALIGN Executive Director Maritza Silva-Farrell expressed concern about policy implementation when it comes to climate change and related issues like transit. She mentioned 2019’s Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act, a landmark state law that requires New York to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 40% by 2030 and at least 85% by 2050 from 1990 levels. She worries that the state isn’t moving quickly enough on implementation, including the lack of follow-up legislation to ensure funding for the transitions required.
Rob Freudenberg, vice president for energy and environment at the Regional Plan Association, was the third member of that early September Max Politics panel and said that he is also concerned about urgency in government.
He talked about how the city has transformed 14th street “from the slowest to the fastest busway,” redeveloped waterfront areas, and expanded bike infrastructure. He said that New York has “no shortage of data points” for what does and doesn't work. His question: where is the scale?
“We need to take elected officials from Albany and New York [City] to the corners of New York City that actually have proven these models and start asking our leadership why they continue to fail to scale,” Freudenberg said. “Why aren't you bringing this across the city especially to the most vulnerable communities, to the [environmental justice] communities?”
Despite the daunting existential challenges, Furnas expressed optimism that New York can rise to meet them, especially given recent changes and the next generation of leadership coming into city government.
The pandemic has allowed for New Yorkers to see “amazing things” as streets have become transformed, he said on the podcast, with parking spaces turned into outdoor dining areas and more. He agreed when Max asked about the importance of improving bus service and making buses an increasingly high priority for policy-making and better option for New Yorkers. He also stressed the administration’s support for the congestion pricing program that has been delayed but is now moving forward and aims to reduce car traffic into Manhattan while funding mass transit upgrades for the city’s subway system.
“I'm cautiously optimistic that folks sort of see a future where we so dramatically need to be moving rapidly away from fossil fuels,” Furnas said. “We need to be embracing what's great about New York City by continuing to let people move to places that are easy to get around using only the subway. I have a lot of friends and acquaintances who ran races and are now coming into the City Council, there’s a lot of generational changes going on all across the city and i think there’s a lot of dynamics that are really positive in that, it's exciting to see a next generation of leaders sort of come up and think about these things in a broader, more holistic way, part of that is I think younger people see the realities of climate change…It is this generation of professionals that needs to do this.”
[LISTEN: Max Politics Podcast: Hurricane Ida, Climate Change and Where We Go Next in New York]
***
by John Besche, Gotham Gazette
@GothamGazette
City Council Member Carlina Rivera (photo: John McCarten/City Council)
October 1, 2021 - Max Politics Podcast: City Council Member Carlina Rivera on Hospitals Oversight & More
City Council Member Carlina Rivera, a Manhattan Democrat who chairs the Council's Committee on Hospitals, joined the show to discuss two recent hearings she chaired, including one on the city's covid vaccine program, her upcoming legislative priorities, her bid to become the next City Council Speaker, and more.
Listen to the conversation and let us know what you think, on Twitter @TweetBenMax. You can listen to the show through the embedded audio below or download the episode wherever you get your podcasts at Max Politics.