Curtis Sliwa on the campaign trail (photo: @CurtisSliwa)
With relatively little money in the bank and only a tenuous tie to his newfound party, Curtis Sliwa, the Republican nominee for mayor, is running on name recognition and four-decade history of catching headlines. But in public appearances and on his website he has put forth an outline of his vision for New York City with policies that span the political spectrum.
Sliwa has been a peripheral figure amongst the characters of New York City since the 1980s when his neighborhood watch group, the Guardian Angels, came to prominence. His time in the spotlight has ebbed and flowed, though he has been a consistent tabloid and broadcast presence over the years. In recent decades, he's been known to New Yorkers as a controversial and conservative talk radio host who adamantly opposed Donald Trump and only took up the Republican mantle in 2020 as he approached a run for mayor in this year’s election.
"A lot of Trumpers overlooked that and decided I should be the Republican candidate, I think based on what I've done in the city for 42 years, especially with a focus on public safety," he said in a recent interview with Gotham Gazette. "A lot of other people don't realize, I'm the independent candidate."
Sliwa calls himself a “populist” who is offering “compassionate” solutions for New York City’s problems, though he is also supportive of harkening back to some of the ‘tough-on-crime’ policies of the Bloomberg and Giuliani years. He stresses that he’s not easily put into an ideological category, that he doesn’t get along with many Republican Party leaders, and he’s been openly courting followers of former mayoral candidate Andrew Yang, who recently left the Democratic Party to become an independent.
In recent years, Sliwa helped lead a takeover of the New York Reform Party before it lost its ballot line and disbanded. He then registered as a Republican and won the mayoral primary by a wide margin before facing off against Democratic nominee Eric Adams and other candidates in the general election.
According to his campaign spokesperson, Teresa Holliday, Sliwa’s top priorities are "Restoring public safety," expanding education, "Protecting the homeless," universal basic income, tax reform, and animal well-being. His website lists a broader range of issues.
Between the primary and general elections, Sliwa has raised just shy of $1 million in private campaign contributions and just recently qualified for public matching funds bringing his total fundraising to just over $4 million. It's not insignificant, but paltry compared to $19.8 million (public and private) raised by his main opponent, Adams, the Brooklyn Borough President.
Sliwa believes addressing crime and disorder is the gateway to improving other social ills. That philosophy pervades a large number of his stances.
His highest priority is increasing funding for the NYPD and hiring 3,000 additional police officers. He frequently uses the slogan "refund the police," which could entail adding about $107 million in city funding to the current operating budget in order to be in line with the fiscal year 2020 budget, adopted before the "Defund" movement took off. Part of what he means is reinstituting the plainclothes “anti-crime” unit that Mayor de Blasio and Police Commissioner Dermot Shea shuttered in 2020 following Black Lives Matter protests across the city. It also means cracking down on gun violence and a greater police presence in public housing, more cops on the subways, and more use of stop-and-frisk tactics, though he stresses it all must be done constitutionally — and in some of these stances and others, he and Adams are often aligned.
On brand for Sliwa, his website devotes a specific section for subway safety. He calls for more NYPD patrols underground to the tune of 4,500 uniformed officers and 500 undercovers, plus another 500 MTA cops specifically dedicated to fare evasion.
Part of what he views as "subway safety" includes removing homeless people to shelters and people in emotional distress to psychiatric facilities.
Sliwa was asked about his pro-institutionalization stance in the recent interview with Gotham Gazette's Ben Max. "Especially if they don't have a family or if families are incapable of caring for them," he said, "and especially if it requires them being medicated by someone because they either are unwilling to get medicated or they won't continue on with their medication."
During Sliwa’s first debate with Adams on Wednesday, he said he wants to see the state lower the bar for forced institutionalization by court order.
Like Adams -- a former cop who is also widely viewed as a law-and-order candidate -- Sliwa wants to pair mental health experts with police officers on calls related to someone in emotional or psychological distress.
He believes to get unsheltered individuals off streets and subways the city must address safety in shelters by assigning social workers and police officers to deescalate altercations and deter crime. He wants to see more shelter beds and more in-house services like meals, laundry, and counseling.
His plan to address homelessness also involves converting government properties to, and encouraging private sector development of, low-rent supportive housing. For such apartments, he says individuals would need to be employed or seeking employment and must see counselors and remain out of jail. Beyond supportive housing, the plan includes mentorship and enrichment programing for homeless youths, more social workers on the streets, and fully funding the Association of Community Employment's programs for homeless people.
Meanwhile, Sliwa has been remarkably anti-development in public appearances, especially for a Republican candidate for mayor, saying that population growth in the city should not be a metric of success and that quality of life for people is better when the city is less crowded. He has also criticized big development projects like Hudson Yards.
But he does devote a portion of his platform to building affordable housing for low- and middle-income residents. His proposals include rezoning and streamlining permitting to allow for the quick conversion of vacant storefronts and retail space into housing units. He also supports rezoning former manufacturing sites in Gowanus, SoHo and NoHo, and Long Island City. He wants to secure funding for and expand the Mitchell-Lama program. (Again, a number of these stances are similar to Adams’.)
Sliwa also wants to make a number of changes to the property tax system, including placing a 2% cap on annual increases to the city's tax levy, instituting decennial reviews of tax exemptions, and adjusting the way property values are assessed. He wants to end tax breaks for private universities, hospitals, and Madison Square Garden, and create new breaks for senior homeowners earning less than $75,000 a year.
He acknowledges the disrepair of New York City's public housing but opposes proposals to fix NYCHA property through public-private partnerships and the sale of air rights.
"There is no doubt in my mind that there is a plan eventually to try to dislodge residents and move them in a different direction," he told Gotham Gazette of unnamed conspirators. Instead he wants to see more, and more efficient use of, federal funding and to use other revenue streams like the Department of Transportation's Adopt-A-Highway program. He advocates for allowing some public housing tenants to become owners by purchasing equity in their apartments. Like many tenant advocates, and Adams, Sliwa wants to see more resident management, vocational training, and employment.
Sliwa has the goal of providing annual ‘basic income’ checks of $2,000 to 100,000 families out of the budgets of the education department and office of mental health (formerly ThriveNYC) while also reducing class sizes and raising teachers' salaries -- and without raising taxes. The main path to doing this, he has said, is eliminating or reducing the salaries of six-figured administrative positions in city government. To be eligible for the checks, parents would have to be employed, have at least one child in school, and meet income requirements. His plan also entails support for school supplies and a back-to-school tax holiday, some of which would require approval by state lawmakers.
Sliwa also wants to expand gifted and talented programming for younger children and vocational training in high schools. He wants more charter schools and to encourage the development of private and religious schools. He also believes he can help students save money by mandating all public higher education institutions offer three-year degree programs.
In public appearances, including on the debate stage Wednesday, Sliwa said he opposed recent covid vaccine mandates for private businesses and the municipal workforce and suggestions to require vaccines for public school students (Adams said he supports all of them). “I disagree with Eric. I feel that we don't have enough police officers as it is,” he said. “We should never fire people for that reason,” Sliwa said of the possibility that some officers will not comply with the vaccine requirement and be placed on leave.
For small businesses, Sliwa would impose a 60-day deadline on permitting and licensing for new companies and expand training on the city's regulatory process. He also wants to establish a small business loan program in lower- and middle-income neighborhoods with loans between $300 and 45,000.
If Sliwa is not known for his anti-crime focus, he is known for his cats. The Upper West Side studio apartment he shares with his wife, who is running for City Council, and sixteen cats has become a campaign headquarters of sorts and captures a central theme of his campaign: animal welfare.
Above all, that means instituting no-kill animal shelters throughout the five boroughs. It also means reallocating part of the city's animal shelter budget to spaying and neutering animals in households and outside.
Sliwa’s animal welfare platform has a police element: he wants to strengthen the NYPD's Elevating Crimes Against Animals division and work with district attorneys to prosecute animal harm cases. According to his website, that would address "the link between animal abuse and subsequent criminal activity."
And with so many rescue cats, it's not surprising that the final plank of this platform includes"[f]ighting the oppressive regulations about animals in homes," including restrictions on pet ownership in NYCHA and private rentals.
***
by Ethan Geringer-Sameth, reporter, Gotham Gazette
@GeringerSameth @GothamGazette
Council Member Justin Brannan, left, & challenger Brian Fox
Justin Brannan, a first-term Democrat from southern Brooklyn, wants to be the next speaker of the City Council. But first he must win his reelection race in District 43 against Republican nominee Brian Fox, a controversial candidate with a history of sharing conspiracy theories and misinformation espoused by the alt-right.
Brannan is promising a continuation of what he says was a productive first term in which he brought much needed resources back to his district and concertedly responded to constituent concerns while attending to the district’s diverse constituencies. Fox, on the other hand, is laser-focused on crime and quality of life, which he believes have deteriorated under Brannan’s watch.
District 43 straddles the waterfront at the southwestern tip of Brooklyn, encompassing Bay Ridge, Dyker Heights, Bensonhurst, and Bath Beach. Bay Ridge has among the largest concentrations of white residents across the city, according to 2020 Census data analyzed by the Department of City Planning, and the neighborhood along with Bensonhurst saw the largest increase in Hispanic population over the last ten years. The Asian population has also been rapidly increasing, and a large Arab and Palestinian population calls the district home.
In 2020, Community Districts 10 and 11, which cover the Council district as well as Fort Hamilton, Gravesend, and Mapleton, held 334,941 residents, 42.3% of whom were white, 36.6% Asian, 16.3% Hispanic, and 1.4% Black.
Brannan won the seat in 2017 with a margin of just 794 votes – in a low turnout election against Republican John Quaglione – succeeding Council Member Vincent Gentile, a Democrat whom Brannan previously served as chief of staff. He went unchallenged in this year’s primary and is favored to win the general, in part given the power of incumbency. As of February 21, the Council district had 105,453 registered voters, including 53,098 Democrats, 20,721 Republicans, and 27,364 unaffiliated independent voters. But the area has elected Republicans in the not too distant past.
Justin Brannan
Brannan’s politics are a balancing act of progressive positions and more center-left ones. Over the years, he has assiduously built coalitions with labor unions, moderates, progressive elected officials, and Democratic county officials while also keeping a lot of focus on district needs in an area of the city that often feels ignored by City Hall. In recent Democratic primary elections he has endorsed Senator Bernie Sanders for president and Borough President Eric Adams for mayor.
Part of his approach also stems from his desire to be the next speaker of the City Council, an internal election that will happen through a vote of the 51-member legislative body in January but will likely be decided by Council members and a variety of power brokers before then. Brannan has been steadily running for speaker for years, laying early groundwork not like after taking office, following a model of the current speaker, Corey Johnson.
On the campaign trail as he seeks another term in the Council, Brannan is pitching a productive first term while pointing to Fox as unfit for the job. In an interview, he touted several accomplishments including funding four new schools in the district, bringing in an estimated $100 million for parks, playgrounds, libraries, food pantries, and non-profits, and passing legislation to create a five-borough climate adaptation and resiliency plan, among other things.
“I'm very proud of that, that I've been able to bring back so much money directly to the community,” he said. “And that doesn't happen automatically. You have to fight to actually get that done.”
Brannan said he’s most proud of the day-to-day work of his office, “some of the stuff you don’t hear about,” providing constituents with direly needed services throughout the pandemic. “You're gonna get our full attention, full support from beginning to end,” he said. “We're gonna see it through with you from the phone call to the resolution. And that ultimately is the job.”
For a possible next term, Brannan has big ideas. He wants to work with the mayor and legislators in Albany to institute a universal afterschool program, building on the success of Mayor Bill de Blasio’s universal pre-kindergarten and 3-K for All programs. “We have to look more holistically at the education system and this sort of 8:30 to 2:30 model that maybe made sense back in the Leave it to Beaver days doesn’t work anymore,” he said.
He will push for citywide universal broadband, treating wi-fi internet as a public utility. “It’s just as crucial as turning on a faucet and water comes out,” Brannan said.
And he wants to undertake reforms to the city’s contract procurement system, in part to reduce the timeline on city capital projects which are often delayed past the terms that Council members serve. “It’s indefensible to tell a parent that building a playground, hopefully it’ll be done by the time their kid’s at Dartmouth,” he said.
With the city’s nonprofit organizations serving as a crucial partner in providing government services, particularly through the pandemic, Brannan said he wants to do more to support them including by increasing funding and ensuring timely payment of contracts.
Brannan’s opponent is first-time candidate Brian Fox, who seems to have a penchant for controversial ideas. His social media is replete with conspiracy theory posts about everything from the 2020 presidential election to the January 6 Capitol insurrection to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Brannan didn’t mince words when talking about his opponent, who he says has repeatedly lied on the stump about Brannan’s work during his first term. “No one knows who he is or where he came from. Politically, he just arrived. No experience in much of anything really,” he said.
“He’s a demagogue,” Brannan added, pointing to Fox’s tendency to share conspiracy theories online. “He’s just unfit to serve and he has no idea of the needs of the community.”
Brian Fox
Fox is a local entrepreneur and runs Phillip Martin Talent Advisors, a recruitment and contracting firm that he founded last year.
He said that he is running because of his singular concern about crime. During 2020, shootings and murders skyrocketed in New York City, as they did in many cities across the state and country, even as major felony crime overall decreased slightly in the five boroughs.
Fox is among those on the right and the center who have attributed the increase in gun violence in the city to efforts to “Defund the NYPD” and changes to state bail laws, though there is no direct evidence to support the assertion. He has campaigned saying Brannan voted to defund the police after Brannan voted in favor of the city’s budget last year when the City Council and mayoral administration diverted several hundred millions of dollars away from the police department. Brannan, who has been vocal about his support for police and other uniformed city workers, was not among the loud progressive voices in the Council who pushed for the NYPD cuts, but did not join some of the more conservative members who voted against the budget because of the cuts (several more progressive members voted no because they felt the cuts didn’t go far enough).
“What prompted me to run was not just crime, but also the safety of everyone in this district regardless of your political affiliation,” Fox said in a phone interview. In that vein, he has harped on Brannan for his repeated traffic violations, which include speeding in school zones. “Mr. Brannan’s arrogance behind the wheel is breathtaking and dangerous,” Fox said in an October 13 statement. “Here’s an elected official who’s constantly lecturing constituents about driving safely while continually breaking the law himself.”
If he wins, Fox has promised to improve policing and quality of life in the district. He wants to increase the police budget, push for more cops on the street, reinstitute a plainclothes police unit that was disbanded last year, and emphasize broken windows policing. “I think that broken windows will stop not just repeat offenders, but also get a lot of our illegal guns off the streets,” he said of the approach that prioritizes cracking down on smaller crimes and disorder to prevent more serious crime.
“My entire business and revenue generation and everything that I do revolves around human interaction...I think that my strength lies within really understanding the people that I'm speaking with and understanding that each individual want and need is very, very different,” he added.
Fox said he would work with the Department of Sanitation to step up efforts against graffiti, more efficiently get the trash picked up, and cut down on illegal dumping by increasing fines.
On issues like increasing housing affordability, improving mass transit, and promoting climate resiliency, Fox offered few specifics. “When it comes to infrastructure, it just has been a growing issue across the entire city and that goes beyond what I'm even able to do once I’m elected,” he said.
One issue that Fox feels strongly about is animal welfare and he wants to implement “no kill” shelters across the city, similar to Republican mayoral nominee Curtis Sliwa. He has also floated legislation to create a New York City Malfeasance Review Board, “a civilian organization with the authority to punish city elected officials who have broken the law,” according to his website. All city elected officials would fall under the agency’s jurisdiction and it would have the power to dole out punishments including “the removal of privileges such as parking placards and reductions in pay.”
In a lengthy analysis of Fox’s background and political ideology, Radio Free Bay Ridge, a local podcast, found countless cases of social media posts about conspiracy theories and sympathies with the so-called alt-right. In one example, Fox liked a tweet that said that he would “make Bay Ridge white again.” Fox, according to the examination, derived much of his news from alt-right YouTube accounts and regularly shared conspiracy theories to his Facebook page, including posts calling into question the results of the 2020 presidential election, which members of the alt-right, former President Donald Trump and many of his other supporters falsely claim was stolen by President Joe Biden because of massive election fraud that never took place.
Fox disputes those claims. He alleged that the author of the analysis, Dan Hetteix, is a friend of Brannan’s and was appointed by him to Brooklyn Community Board 10 - Brannan denies being friends with Hetteix. Fox also said many of the allegations in the story were fabricated and “flat out lies,” though he did not provide a detailed account that refuted them. (During the phone interview, Fox’s campaign spokesperson, Bill O’Reilly, interjected to note that the Radio Free story was released after Fox called for Hetteix to be removed from the community board over a boycott of local businesses over alleged failure to screen customers for vaccinations.)
“I am not alt-right,” Fox said. “My views and ideology are not at all alt-right or extreme right despite what they've tried to label me as. I’m what I'd like to call the sensibility candidate when it comes to very, very basic and fundamental things — crime, sensibility, quality of life.”
He also acknowledged that Biden won the 2020 presidential election, though he did talk about election fraud generally. “Historically, throughout our election system, there has been increasing levels of fraudulent stuff and fraudulent activity,” he said, though repeated election audits have disproved that notion. “Now, that doesn't matter in this local election. Joe Biden's our president.”
Fox also sought to provide clarity about his position on vaccinations and masks, after the Radio Free story pointed out his attendance at rallies that also had anti-vaccination and anti-masking protesters. “I am in no way shape or form an anti-vaxxer at all,” he said. “I mean, that's something I have never stated, I have never believed in. It's not part of my ideology.” He said he only opposes vaccination mandates that he believes have hurt small businesses. “It’s a matter of having choice,” he said.
***
by Samar Khurshid, senior reporter, Gotham Gazette
@samarkhurshid @GothamGazette
Eric Adams & Curtis Sliwa
With early voting set to begin on Saturday, Brooklyn Borough President Eric Adams, the Democratic mayoral nominee, squared off on Wednesday against his Republican rival, Guardian Angels founder Curtis Sliwa, in the first of two official debates of the general election.
The debate was hosted by the New York City Campaign Finance Board in partnership with WNBC-TV, Telemundo, Politico, Citizens Budget Commission, and the New York Urban League. Early voting will be October 23-31 and Election Day is Tuesday, November 2. Absentee balloting is ongoing.
Wednesday’s debate, which was mandatory under the city’s campaign finance law for qualifying candidates receiving public matching funds, was the first time in the campaign that the two major party nominees came face to face. There were marked distinctions between Adams and Sliwa on everything from vaccine mandates to public safety and policing, affordable housing policies, the scheduled closure of Rikers Island, mental health programs, and more.
Adams, in his second term as borough president after several as a state senator, is a former NYPD captain who won the Democratic nomination after a hotly-contested primary. He is seen as the likely general election winner since Democrats outnumber Republicans nearly seven-to-one in the city.
He has said he’s running to become the first “blue collar mayor” of New York, with a campaign heavily focused on crime and public safety, but also education, other issues, and government function itself. In the primary Adams had the support of several major labor unions and even reportedly the blessing of incumbent Mayor Bill de Blasio, though the unpopular mayor did not officially announce his endorsement until after the primary. Adams, who has also recently received the backing of former Mayor Michael Bloomberg, has walked a fine line of promoting policies that favor working people and uplifting the city’s most disadvantaged while also embracing wealthier New Yorkers, business leaders, and the influential real estate industry.
Sliwa, a controversial radio host and long-time New York City character, handily won the Republican primary against advocate and businessman Fernando Mateo. Sliwa is also running on a platform that emphasizes public safety and quality of life issues. But that’s largely where the similarities between the candidates stop, as seen in Wednesday’s debate.
As the underdog in the race, Sliwa attempted to attack Adams on several fronts but his jabs appeared to have limited impact as Adams remained focused on his message and repeatedly accused Sliwa of lying to the audience. Sliwa also appeared undisciplined at times, launching into asides and not sticking to one or two consistent criticisms of Adams.
The moderators too raised important questions about the honesty and integrity of the candidates, who both have a history of stretching the truth.
When asked about making up crime incidents, including a fake kidnapping, as the founder of the Guardian Angels that did subway and street patrols starting in the late 1970s, Sliwa admitted fault while insisting he has earned the trust of New Yorkers who see him on the street. “I made mistakes. I was immature at the age of 25,” he said. “[I] did things I should not have done...I did apologize for it. I brought it to everybody's attention and I'll continue to apologize for it.”
Adams, on the other hand, has continued to face more recent questions about his tax returns, which he has amended multiple times over the course of the campaign and which cast some doubt on whether his primary residence is in Brooklyn. Though he laid some of the blame on his accountant, who he said had been homeless and faced mental health issues, Adams also accepted his part. “I take full responsibility,” he said. “We amended the taxes, and we are pleased to move forward and that mistake would not happen again.”
Asked for a rough estimate of how many nights over the last six months he has slept at the brownstone he says is his primary residence, Adams did not provide a count, saying only that it is his primary residence and that he sometimes sleeps at Brooklyn Borough Hall. He made no mention of the New Jersey apartment he co-owns with his partner. And, when given the opportunity by the moderators, Adams declined to respond to Sliwa’s prompts about Department of Buildings inspectors seeking to examine Adams’ garden-level dwelling in his Brooklyn building.
The question of public safety naturally loomed large over the debate and though the two candidates share some common ground, there were degrees of difference in their stated approaches.
Sliwa pledged to hire 3,000 more police officers, paid for with property taxes on currently exempt institutions like Madison Square Garden and Columbia University (an idea he borrowed from Andrew Yang, who ran in the Democratic primary against Adams and Sliwa praised at the debate, saying Adams had driven Yang from the Democratic Party).
Sliwa has called for reinstituting more aggressive stop-and-frisk policing, a controversial tactic employed en masse by former Mayor Michael Bloomberg that ended up targeting mostly innocent young Black and Latino men. The use of the tactic declined heavily, and has continued to do so over the years, after a federal judge ruled in 2013 that the way it was used by the NYPD was unconstitutional.
But Sliwa pointed out, correctly, that Adams too has defended the use of stop-and-frisk when it is done constitutionally. “As my opponent Eric Adams has also said, he would selectively allow for the use of stop, question and frisk for reasonable suspicion, as I would,” Sliwa said, noting that Adams has accepted Bloomberg’s endorsement in this race.
Adams has called for the limited use of stop-and-frisk as well as reinstating a plainclothes anti-gun police unit that was disbanded last year because of a pattern of excessive force. At the debate, Adams repeated the line he has used throughout his campaign. “Public safety is the prerequisite to prosperity,” he said, promising to “change the ecosystem for public safety.” He touted his own attempts to fight the abuse of stop-and-frisk, citing his testimony before the judge in 2013, and his history of arguing for police reform from within the department. “I never called for aggressive police tactics, I called for appropriate police tactics,” he said.
Earlier on Wednesday, Mayor de Blasio announced a vaccine mandate for all city workers. At the same time, he has resisted doing so for public school students.
Adams said at the debate that he supports the mayor’s decision to require mandates for workers even if it would mean that some police officers and firefighters, who have lower rates of vaccination, could be kept out of work. “I believe the mayor's action today was correct,” he said, though he insisted he would have handled the situation differently to get the parties, including labor unions, to agreement. Adams does, however, support requiring vaccines for public school students if approved and recommended by health experts. “We are going to follow the science,” he said, while adding that he is “open to a remote option” for students.
Sliwa has opposed both mandates. “I disagree with Eric. I feel that we don't have enough police officers as it is,” he said, adding that “we should never fire people for that reason.” Sliwa did not directly say, however, why he opposed mandatory covid vaccinations for school students when there are already existing mandates for measles, mumps, and rubella that he appears to have no issue with.
As the city continues on the road to economic recovery from the pandemic, the candidates had few specific ideas to offer at the debate about how they would encourage growth and entice new businesses to the five boroughs.
Adams said he would suspend all fines on small businesses, invest in universal childcare and job training.
“We have to use common sense, and that has to do with public safety in the streets, in the subways,” Sliwa said. “If it's not safe, workers are going to stay away.” He also said the city needs to repurpose empty commercial space for affordable housing.
Hurricane Ida exposed New York City’s vulnerability to extreme weather events as well as the plight of New Yorkers who live in illegal basement units, where 13 people died because of flooding. Both candidates were pressed on how they would respond to those problems.
“We're going to institute a clear response plan like we have with terrorism,” Adams said of his apporach to weather emergencies. “We learned from terrorism. You don't wait till the day of or when a plane attacks.”
Adams has also promised to bring illegal basement apartments up to code, which he said he would do through a coordinated effort between the Department of Buildings and the Fire Department. In the meantime, however, he said he would set up a notification system for emergencies. “It's about legalizing these apartments so that we don't displace people unjustly,” he said.
Sliwa said his administration would prevent flooding by “clean[ing] the catch basins and the sewers on a regular basis, get those sea walls built up [in Staten Island and Downtown Manhattan] and make sure that areas are designated a flood zone.” Unlike Adams, Sliwa has opposed legalizing basement units and blamed the real estate industry for creating illegal subdivisions in homes.
An immediate crisis that the next mayor will inherit is the deteriorating situation at the Rikers Island jail complex, where a dozen detainees have died this year. Adams supports the city’s plan to close the complex by 2026 and replace it with four borough-based facilities, though he has repeatedly said he is open to reexamining aspects of the plan, like jail size and location. Sliwa is opposed to it.
As for the immediate crisis, Adams said the city should “stop the bottleneck” that prevents detainees from going to court to resolve their cases and should bring corrections guards back to work.
Sliwa said he would hire 2,000 more correctional officers and divert emotionally disturbed detainees to state health facilities. He also made an eyebrow-raising promise. “There is a warden’s house on Rikers Island. January 2, that's where I'm staying, the warden’s house,” he said, “to supervise what has to be the health and safety of the correctional officers who have the toughest job in the city.”
On the issue of mental health, which the de Blasio administration has struggled to deal with, especially in terms of the most severe cases, both candidates insisted on the need for more permanent housing with wraparound services. Sliwa said he would investigate the ThriveNYC program, which was overseen by First Lady Chirlane McCray and has shown limited results despite more than $1 billion in spending and a great deal of hype from the mayor and administration. Sliwa also said the state should change the law to allow more involuntary institutionalization of people with mental health problems. Adams opposed the change.
Adams also said he wants to convert vacant hotel properties into affordable housing, which Sliwa is against. Instead, Sliwa said the city should rezone unused manufacturing and commercial areas for affordable housing.
One area of agreement between the two candidates is their opposition to Mayor de Blasio’s announcement that the city will phase out the gifted and talented program at some city schools. Currently, admission into the G&T program depends on a single test given to four-year-olds, which critics say exacerbates racial segregation in schools and provides a too-limited snapshot of what constitutes aptitude and promise. De Blasio said the test would be eliminated and the entire program would be replaced with an “accelerated learning” model available to all students.
“We need to expand gifted and talented, so it's in all schools,” Sliwa said. “Even if only three or two children qualify in the Bronx or Brooklyn, there should be gifted and talented in those schools.”
Adams agreed that the city should expand opportunities while also increasing attention to children with learning disabilities. “We need to look at that exam,” he said. “I don't believe a four-year-old taking the exam should determine the rest of their school experience. That is unacceptable.” Adams said he would expand accelerated learning opportunities and how the city reaches students with promise in different areas and offers them opportunity. He has indicated he would give some version of a gifted test to all students, with the option for parents to opt out.
On other questions, more differences emerged.
Sliwa said he would not support a requirement that all municipal workers return to the office in person. “How can they order all the city workers back when members of the City Council are not back? They're not in their chambers,” he said. Adams said it should be done “in layers.” “There's some clear jobs that we can do remotely...Once we reach a safe place and realize we're not having a spike in covid, then we can bring back an additional number,” he said.
Adams demurred when asked if he would support a legal challenge against that mandate by DC37, the city’s largest public union which has endorsed him. “They have the right to go to court, as any other union should do, and I will respect the decision that comes from the court,” Adams said.
Adams supports instituting congestion pricing in Manhattan, though he called for waivers in certain cases of medical need. Sliwa said the policy “would crush the middle class residents” from other boroughs who drive into Manhattan and said it should be proposed to New Yorkers as a ballot referendum.
Adams called for increasing permits for street vendors and allowing them more space to sell their wares. Sliwa called for greater enforcement by the police instead.
Sliwa opposed the removal of a statue of Thomas Jefferson, who was a slave owner, from City Hall while Adams supported it.
Adams said he would let outdoor dining structures remain in place while Sliwa said the city should “downsize” them.
Adams promised to maintain New York’s status as a sanctuary city for undocumented immigrants while Sliwa said the city should cooperate with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).
Sliwa pledged to ban horse carriages in Central Park and replace them with electric vehicles while Adams said he would work with the union of horse carriage drivers to “find a better way, if need be, to move around the Central Park area.”
Both candidates said the school year should be longer. Neither named a candidate they would support in the governor’s race next year. And neither committed to race and gender benchmarks for hiring in their administrations.
Adams and Sliwa will debate each other again on October 26.
***
by Samar Khurshid, senior reporter, Gotham Gazette
@samarkhurshid @GothamGazette