Officials touring the Kingsbridge Armory (photo: William Alatriste/NYC Council Media Unit)
The Kingsbridge Armory, the largest of its kind in the world at 520,000 square-feet, has sat vacant for more than three decades as plans to redevelop the structure have repeatedly failed. But the city is undertaking yet another attempt to reenvision the armory for modern use, and local lawmakers are optimistic that this time they will succeed.
Built in 1917 for the New York National Guard, the armory had been used for myriad purposes until it was decommissioned in 1991 and then given over to the city in 1996. But the armory, occupying an entire city block between Jerome Avenue and Reservoir Avenue in the Kingsbridge neighborhood of the Bronx, is a complicated site to redevelop. It was designated a city landmark in 1974 and then listed on the National Register of Historic Places in 1982.
Over the years, the city has proposed various uses for the space, which includes a 180,000-square-foot column-free drill hall, five garage units, and 120-foot ceilings roughly as tall as an 11-story apartment building. Mayor Michael Bloomberg tried to convert the armory into a retail mall, a plan that was shot down by the City Council in December 2009 in a near-unanimous vote, chiefly over concerns that the project failed to require “living wage” job provisions for the developer. Bloomberg vetoed the Council’s vote but was overridden.
The last proposal, first announced by Bloomberg in 2013, involved turning the armory into the world’s largest ice rink facility, the Kingsbridge National Ice Center (KNIC), a 750,000-square-foot complex with nine indoor regulation-size ice rinks, 5,000 seats and 50,000 square feet of space for community use. The plan was estimated to create about 180 permanent jobs and 890 construction jobs.
The KNIC plan was unanimously approved by the City Planning Commission and then passed by the City Council in a 48-1 vote in 2013, as the mayor’s third and final term wound down, as well as the terms for many City Council members.
Over the years, however, the project stalled as the city’s development partner, KNIC LLC, which included former New York Rangers star hockey player Mark Messier, failed to obtain sufficient capital to fund it. In 2016, seeking to galvanize the project, the state’s Public Authorities Control Board approved a $30 million loan from the Empire State Development Corporation to KNIC to begin construction on the first phase of the project. In 2017, then-Governor Andrew Cuomo announced another $108 million loan to the project in his State of the State address.
Questions about transfer of the lease for the armory from the city to the development group became a contentious affair among the group, Cuomo, and then-Bronx Borough President Ruben Diaz Jr on one side and then-Mayor Bill de Blasio and city entities on the other.
In December 2021, the plan finally fell through and the city ended its contract with KNIC LLC, after a lengthy court battle that ended with a judge ordering that the armory’s lease would remain with the city’s Economic Development Corporation.
Now the city is taking up the task of another community engagement process to determine how to overhaul and rehabilitate the armory more than a hundred years after it was built. The effort comes on the heels of the controversial redevelopment of the Bedford Union Armory in Brooklyn, a mixed-use project redeveloped by the real estate firm BFC Partners, with 415 units of housing and a 60,000-square-foot community center that opened last October.
Earlier this year, City Council Speaker Adrienne Adams and City Council Member Pierina Sanchez, whose district includes the armory, set aside $5 million for initial renovations on the structure. The state also re-appropriated the $108 million in this year’s budget for any potential future redevelopment of the armory, the governor’s office confirmed.
“There have never been successful conversations about the permanent uses [of the armory], uses that will serve the community,” said Sanchez, a former urban planner who is just over nine months into her Council tenure, in a phone interview. Sanchez is co-chairing a community working group, along with Sandra Lobo, executive director of Northwest Bronx Community and Clergy Coalition, to oversee a six-month community visioning process along with the EDC.
The next project will also likely need to go through the city’s lengthy Uniform Land Use Review Procedure (ULURP), which only starts once there's a project plan and, if needed, private partners on board.
“The hope for the armory is a space that is really a driver of economic development for the community,” Sanchez said, “that is bringing good jobs, local hire…could be business, could be other kinds of uses that are responsive to the community and are going to be helping to build wealth and health in the community.”
Sanchez wants to oversee a robust community engagement process, supported by technical assistance from the city, and a strong community benefits agreement like the one that was included in the KNIC proposal, which would have provided living wage jobs for all employees, 51% of jobs and contracts reserved for Bronx residents, 51% of contracts for Minority and/or Women Owned Businesses, a Green Action Plan to improve the environmental impact of the project, free access to ice rinks for Bronx Title 1 schools and community groups, a small business technical assistance fund, among other things.
“That's the floor, not the ceiling,” Sanchez said. “That’s the floor in these discussions. Community is at the center.”
As Sanchez noted, the armory is often considered as a space for emergency uses, including recently as the city has experienced an influx of thousands of migrant asylum seekers, burdening the already struggling shelter system. But she said the armory has hazards that make it unfit for those uses, including potential lead and asbestos contamination. The Council’s $5 million allocation is meant to remediate those immediate concerns.
“It's a downpayment on addressing some of those environmental hazards and concerns so that the community can actually access the space and be a part of the visioning process,” she said. “I will yell at the top of my lungs to get as much more funding as I can from the city side of things.”
“We are excited to learn more about the community’s priorities for the Kingsbridge Armory,” said an EDC spokesperson in a statement to Gotham Gazette. “As New York City continues its recovery from the pandemic, redevelopment of the Armory can support outer-borough economic development, bringing new investment, good-paying jobs, and overall benefits to the neighborhood, the Bronx, and the city at large. We look forward to an open conversation with community members so the new Kingsbridge Armory becomes an asset every Bronxite can feel proud of.”
The mayor’s office did not respond to a request for comment for this story.
The armory is also getting attention at the national level. U.S. Secretary of Labor Martin Walsh recently toured the armory with U.S. Rep. Adriano Espaillat, whose district includes the armory, Council Speaker Adams, Council Members Sanchez and Oswald Feliz, (whose district neighbors the armory) Bronx Borough President Vanessa Gibson, and others.
“We don't know how much subsidy dollars beyond what we have today we will be able to secure,” Sanchez said. “These are political processes and budgetary processes…So us local members who represent the community and represent the armory are going to be fighting but it's not guaranteed.”
Espaillat's office did not reply to multiple requests for comment for this story. Walsh's office acknowledged an inquiry but did not provide comment.
State Senator Gustavo Rivera, whose district includes the armory, supported the previous KNIC proposal because of its strong community benefits agreement, and wants something similar for any new redevelopment project. “What's important and has always been important for me is what is at the core of it, and that is…it has to be driven by community needs and community wants,” he said in a phone interview.
“There is a consensus amongst all of us that we need to actually bring together state resources, city resources, and national resources to actually make this into a reality, to make it into a viable economic engine for this community,” he added. “We are working in concert in ways that has not necessarily happened before so I'm quite excited about what the possibilities will bring in the next couple years.”
As Borough President Gibson, a former State Assembly and City Council member who took her current office in January, noted in a phone interview, the current zoning of the area does not allow either building a school or housing. While that zoning could be changed through the city's land use review process, under the current restrictions, Gibson said she would ideally like to see multiple uses for the space including a community recreation center, a health care center, space for businesses (for instance the tech and video gaming industries), and potentially coworking space for entrepreneurs, small businesses, and worker cooperatives. Crucially, the new project should generate revenue for the city, she said.
“We're not waiting, because time is of the essence,” she said. “We have money that's been allocated, money that's already designated from the state and we want to make sure that that money doesn't go away.”
Gibson said the failure of the KNIC project also served as a lesson for local elected officials. “We're going to learn from the past mistakes, and we're going to do things different and better,” she said. The ice center project wasn’t necessarily the best use of the space, she said, but rather just the best proposal at the time.
“I think we need buy-in from the mayor, from the governor,” said Gibson. “We need buy-in from every level of government because this is really an all-hands-on-deck project.”
***
by Samar Khurshid, senior reporter, Gotham Gazette
@samarkhurshid @GothamGazette
Racial justice bills set to be signed by the mayor (photo: Michael Appleton/Mayoral Photography Office)
October 13, 2022 - Max Politics Podcast: Racial Justice Proposals on the New York City Ballot
New York City voters can approve or disapprove three proposed City Charter amendments on the 2022 general election ballot. Questions 2-4 on the ballot for city voters (Question 1 is on the statewide Environmental Bond Act) are proposals from the New York City Racial Justice Commission. Jennifer Jones Austin, Chair of the Racial Justice Commission and President and CEO of FPWA, joined the show to discuss the three proposals as well as broader themes of social, economic, and racial justice in New York City.
Listen to the conversation and let us know what you think, on Twitter @TweetBenMax. You can listen to the show through the embedded audio below or download the episode wherever you get your podcasts at Max Politics.
Read more: Max Politics Podcast: Racial Justice Proposals on the New York City Ballot
Rooftop solar (photo: Governor's Office)
As Mayor Eric Adams’ administration follows ambitious mandates to achieve carbon neutrality over the next few decades, the City Council on Thursday examined the state of renewable energy infrastructure in the city, needs for the future, and both city and state legislation that could help expedite the path towards a zero-emissions energy grid and economy.
At a hearing of the Council’s Committee on Environmental Protection, chaired by Queens Council Member Jim Gennaro, administration officials testified to ongoing efforts at sourcing and converting to renewable energy, decarbonizing the city’s building stock, and investing in climate workforce development. The hearing comes just ahead of the ten year anniversary of Superstorm Sandy, which devastated New York City and caused about $19 billion in damage, the effects of which have yet to be fully remediated.
Gennaro, a Democrat, has long been working at tackling the effects of the climate crisis. He noted in his opening remarks that when he was previously a Council member in 2012, the city codified into law the New York City Panel on Climate Change, just two months ahead of Sandy hitting the city. The panel was meant to examine the effects of climate change on city infrastructure, the economy, and marginalized communities. The law creating the panel also created the New York City Climate Adaptation Task Force “to figure out how the city in a sensible, measured, studious way could walk down the field towards the climate in a resilient future that we all want,” Gennaro said.
At the hearing, he sought answers on the task force’s work over the last decade. “That's a real thing. It's in law. No one seems to be able to find it,” he said. “And I didn't write the law for nothing.”
Rebecca Fishman, a policy advisor from the Mayor's Office of Climate and Environmental Justice (MOCEJ), said that the Climate Adaptation Task Force convened under the previous administration and compiled “an inventory of risks and infrastructure,” which was nearly complete but could not be finished because of the pandemic. “The new office of the mayor, the Mayor's Office of Climate and Environmental Justice, will need to revisit this,” she said.
Gennaro was dissatisfied with the answer, calling on the administration to better coordinate its efforts and follow the “black letter law” which requires the task force to convene every six months. The task force, he said, “has to exist. That's in law, that's a mandate. It's not discretionary. And it's supposed to work hand in glove with the New York City Panel on Climate Change.”
The broader focus of the hearing was on the city’s efforts to meet the renewable energy mandates set by law in recent years.
Under Mayor Bill de Blasio, in 2019, the city passed a “Green New Deal” legislative package that committed to a goal of carbon neutrality by 2050 and 100% clean electricity, along with several measures intended to drastically reduce the city’s greenhouse gas emissions. That same year, the state approved the Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act (CLCPA), which requires the state to cut economy-wide greenhouse gas emissions by 40% by 2030 and by 85% by 2050.
In October of last year, the Council passed another law requiring a Citywide Climate Adaptation Plan, which was due September 30 but has not been published by the administration yet. Council members did not question administration officials about the required report at Thursday’s hearing, however.
Anthony Fiore, the city’s Chief Decarbonization Officer and Deputy Commissioner for Energy Management at the Department of Citywide Administrative Services (DCAS), outlined the many efforts and investments the city is making in renewable energy, including some that were put into motion by the previous administration.
DCAS, which manages city-owned buildings and vehicles, is deploying 100 megawatts of solar energy on city properties by 2025, he said. The city, in partnership with the state, is also investing in building two new transmission lines to bring renewable energy to the city from Canada and Upstate. The city is also a partner on some of the many other efforts the state is taking the lead on, including offshore wind.
The city’s Economic Development Corporation (EDC) also announced last year a 15-year plan to invest $191 million to build offshore wind energy infrastructure and technology. EDC and the City University of New York (CUNY) also announced awards worth $4 million to six colleges for climate career training and education.
Fiore also pointed to the Mayor’s Office of Climate and Environmental Justice, which is leading PowerUp NYC, an energy planning study to meet the city’s sustainability goals. The administration is expected to release that study in the spring, officials said Thursday.
The city’s long-term efforts have made progress, Fiore noted. “Since 2014, DCAS has invested nearly $1 billion in efficiency and clean energy generation projects across 2000 city-owned buildings, contributing to a reduction in city government energy use by the equivalent of about 250,000 residencies, and avoiding about $115 million in annual energy costs, reducing overall greenhouse gas emissions by almost 25% between fiscal years 2006 and 2019 and generating more than 4,000 family-sustaining jobs,” he said.
He also emphasized that efforts have been focused on “historically marginalized communities that experience cumulative disproportionate impacts of environmental hazards and climate risks.” He said the city is undertaking a study of environmental injustice in the city and will release a report that “will identify communities being disproportionately impacted by environmental burdens and will form the basis of an implementation plan to promote environmental justice and ensure equity is an integral part of the city's decision-making processes at large.”
Council Member Sandy Nurse, a Brooklyn Democrat, noted that the recently-approved federal Inflation Reduction Act could help the city achieve many of its climate goals by investing in green infrastructure. “We are still looking at it, but it's something that is on our radar,” said Ellie Kahn, senior policy advisor at the Mayor's Office of Climate and Environmental Justice. “We're absolutely paying attention to it and it's a very, very exciting opportunity.”
Federal, state, and city leaders all expect the Inflation Reduction Act’s many billions of dollars in investments in renewable energy to supercharge New York’s efforts.
Thursday’s City Council hearing also focused on several pieces of proposed legislation and resolutions on climate action.
One bill, sponsored by Council Member Justin Brannan, a Brooklyn Democrat, would require the city’s Department of Environmental Protection to study vacant and underutilized city-owned sites for potential use for building renewable energy infrastructure. Another, sponsored by Gennaro, would require the city to create a database of subsurface conditions that can allow the installation of geothermal heat pumps, a renewable energy source.
Fiore said the administration supports the intent of both bills. Mapping vacant and underutilized space is a “worthwhile exercise” he said, not only for building renewable energy but a myriad of purposes. And he said geothermal energy “is an important tool in the transition to a clean energy economy and in some locations will be a primary method for decarbonizing building heating systems.” He said the city has already created a geothermal screening tool and is carrying out a pilot program to install geothermal systems on city-owned sites, the results of which will begin to be reported in March.
The city’s efforts to decarbonize the privately-owned building stock are also front and center as the Department of Buildings (DOB) is in the process of creating rules that owners of the city’s largest buildings will have to meet to comply with Local Law 97, part of 2019’s Climate Mobilization Act. That law is meant to require major cuts in greenhouse gas emissions from large buildings, the city’s biggest source of carbon emissions. The DOB recently released a first set of draft rules that will now be the subject of a public feedback process.
Also on the agenda were three resolutions, non-binding pieces of legislation that often urge action by another level of government. One, sponsored by Council Member Lincoln Restler, a Brooklyn Democrat, encourages the state to follow the mandates of the CLCPA in aggressive fashion. “The City Council knows all too well that the climate crisis is the single greatest threat facing the people of New York. It's here, it's now and it demands nothing less than urgent and comprehensive action,” he said.
Ahead of the hearing, Council members and environmental advocates from Sierra Club, WE ACT for Environmental Justice, New York Public Interest Research Group, Jewish Climate Action Network, and other organizations rallied outside City Hall in support of the resolution.
As that was happening, the state’s Climate Action Council, created in the CLCPA to help execute it, was meeting to take its next steps toward developing its “scoping plan.” The Climate Action Council has released a draft plan, and continues to take feedback and adjust it toward issuing a final plan by the end of the year.
Another resolution, sponsored by Council Member Alexa Avilés, a Brooklyn Democrat, calls for passage of the Build Public Renewables Act, a bill before the State Legislature that would allow the New York Power Authority to own and build renewable energy infrastructure. “The Build Public Renewables Act will lead us into the future not just on renewable energy, but on labor and employment standards and will undoubtedly serve as a model to other states who pursue democratization of utility services,” she said.
Finally, Gennaro sponsors a resolution in support of the $4.2 billion Clean Water, Clean Air, and Green Jobs Environmental Bond Act, which is a ballot referendum in the November general election after having been passed by the Governor and Legislature. Voters will approve or disapprove the new state borrowing for environmental and climate-related projects.
Governor Kathy Hochul pushed to increase the bond act by more than $1 billion to get to the $4.2 billion now before voters to help fund infrastructure projects across the state that deal with clean water, electric school buses, resiliency projects, and more. Hochul is running for a full term this year in part on her climate record and promise to continue advancing renewable energy projects. There are also several state-level measures that did not pass this year that advocates hope to see advanced next year, including a state ban on new gas hook-ups in buildings to match the city’s, the Build Public Renewables Act, and more -- some of which Hochul has expressed support for.
Also on Thursday, New York City Comptroller Brad Lander, a Democrat and major proponent of climate action, released a report analyzing the city’s expenditure on climate resiliency over the last decade and the obstacles to climate infrastructure projects. It shows that the city has not spent nearly all of the federal money received in Sandy’s aftermath.
“The climate crisis is moving far faster than we are,” Lander said in a statement. “Superstorm Sandy was a wake-up call for the devastating risks that climate change poses to our city – but from the trudging pace of too many resiliency projects, it seems like we’re still asleep. Without significant improvements to infrastructure design and delivery, New York City will fail to get ready in time for the next storm.”
***
by Samar Khurshid, senior reporter, Gotham Gazette
@samarkhurshid @GothamGazette